CapitalSeven
Senior Member
DaninToronto, I wouldn't lash out at the abilities of an established columnist when you yourself are apparently unable to put together a one-line post without multiple errors.
Where to start ...
"try and get" - I assume you mean "try to get"
"without the obvious impartiality" - the literal meaning of what you have typed here (I won't say "written") is the opposite of what you seem to mean.
Is it the writing or the opinions you don't like? Apparently the opinions, since you don't actually mention the "writing." Does that make the author a horrible writer, or just one you don't agree with? If the latter, why not say that instead?
Your post demonstrates that you are in fact the horrible writer, in that your writing is technically faulty and doesn't even say what you mean it to. Next time try adding some content. If you have some better views and opinions to counter with, we'd be happy to read those.
Where to start ...
"try and get" - I assume you mean "try to get"
"without the obvious impartiality" - the literal meaning of what you have typed here (I won't say "written") is the opposite of what you seem to mean.
Is it the writing or the opinions you don't like? Apparently the opinions, since you don't actually mention the "writing." Does that make the author a horrible writer, or just one you don't agree with? If the latter, why not say that instead?
Your post demonstrates that you are in fact the horrible writer, in that your writing is technically faulty and doesn't even say what you mean it to. Next time try adding some content. If you have some better views and opinions to counter with, we'd be happy to read those.