hawc
Senior Member
Ah, makes sense.
There are no discussions I can see of there EVER being a Munition Street bridge. See: https://portlandsto.ca/wp-content/uploads/June262019WTDRP_PLFPRoadsDetailedDesign-watermarked.pdfSomeone can correct me and/or fill in the blanks, but the Munition Street crossing is not part of the current works. In many renderings it's the same as the rest of the new bridges, though.
The issue is that there is nowhere good to connect it to on the other side yet, and major reconstruction of the Gardiner is planned in that area so there's really no point in building a bridge that won't be usable for years and may not even be needed.
There are no discussions I can see of there EVER being a Munition Street bridge. See: https://portlandsto.ca/wp-content/uploads/June262019WTDRP_PLFPRoadsDetailedDesign-watermarked.pdf
and this from 2017: https://portlandsto.ca/wp-content/u...rs+Island+Precinct+Plan+AODA+Attachment+2.pdf
View attachment 464057
There are no discussions I can see of there EVER being a Munition Street bridge. See: https://portlandsto.ca/wp-content/uploads/June262019WTDRP_PLFPRoadsDetailedDesign-watermarked.pdf
and this from 2017: https://portlandsto.ca/wp-content/u...rs+Island+Precinct+Plan+AODA+Attachment+2.pdf
View attachment 464057
The Keating Channel crossing is the one being referred to, not a bridge across the new river valley?
There is no Munition Street bridge that will ever cross the new river valley but the very image you posted shows that there will be one across the Keating Channel; or at least one was planned for....
Further discussion:
View attachment 464058
Text:
View attachment 464059
From: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-107828.pdf
Couldn't resist...I can't wait to finally swim in the Keating Channel! It will be lovely.
Perhaps best to wait a decade until the City and TRCA finish stopping the sewage overflows upstream!I can't wait to finally swim in the Keating Channel! It will be lovely.
And your point is? Toronto and the TRCA are cleaning up the Don River and the lake itself and have been doing so (maybe too slowly) for well over a decade..If Cleveland can clean up its harbour, we can do this! Also maybe we can learn something from the efforts to revitalise the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn. There are precedents out there.
If Cleveland can clean up its harbour, we can do this! Also maybe we can learn something from the efforts to revitalise the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn. There are precedents out there.
They'll have to remove some weeds (scrubs and trees) to do so. Expect to to see some protests in the process.Are there storm sewers near the Don River (like perhaps those on the side of the Don Valley Parkway) that empty directly into the Don? Or do all storm sewers route towards a treatment plant unless overfilled.
Are there storm sewers near the Don River (like perhaps those on the side of the Don Valley Parkway) that empty directly into the Don? Or do all storm sewers route towards a treatment plant unless overfilled.
This may also be of interest! https://www.toronto.ca/services-pay...er-where-does-it-go/combined-sewer-overflows/There are many storm-only drains across the City, some legal/conforming, some not, which empty into assorted rivers/creeks etc.
The real issue is combined sewer overflows CSOs.
Combined sewer overflows result from the storm water off of roads going into the combined sewer with sanitary waste (what you flush); in the 'old City' most sewers are combined rather than separated, so storm water and sanitary water are in the same pipe.
When it rains heavily the emergency design is that these sewers overflow directly into the relevant body of water, untreated.
Sewers in newer parts of the City and new suburbia today are built separated (storm and sanitary flows are in different pipes).
Edit to add:
View attachment 464608
From: https://www.thepristineblue.com/post/climate-change-and-toronto-s-aging-sewage-system
View attachment 464609
The plans now underway to address this:
View attachment 464612