jxmyth_
Senior Member
Can’t make up my mind, but I did like hearing the Nda - Nwendaaganag team talk about having several expedited plans
I totally agree with your #1 and #2 - I like the 'eye' feature on #2 in particular.I honestly like all of them, each one brings a different aspect, style and centre piece.
If I had to rank them it would probably be:
1. Zeilder/Wilkinson Eyre (I love that they try to incorporate the solstices and equinoxes, I wish more architecture did this and its also just a very cool design)
2. RJC/Smoke/MVVA (Looked very simple and plain at first but the night time fish lights and future proofing with rust art really sold me)
3. NDA-NWENDAAGANAG (I really love this design, but its a little too much and I worry they plants wont survive very long knowing the cities track record....)
4. Salmon Run (still very cool but kinda boring and plain compared to the rest)
5. Maamawi Bridge (this was definitely my least favourite, it is nice they integrate with nature, and the bat/bird habitats are cool, but overall very boring)
This is 'wandering path' to allow for views ertc. Being the fastest route from A to B is really not the aim, in my opinion. (In addition, it is really a rather small bridge crossing a quite narrow channel - I doubt there is much difference in distance between 'wandering route' and a direct one.I'll be disappointed if the Zeidler one is chosen. It looks neat, but it will also be a pain to walk across -- it makes the path much longer to cross the water. It falls victim to the same crappy pedestrian design that's so common here, in that designers think that people only walk/bicycle for pleasure, and not to actually get places. This is potentially the main path for thousands of people to and from downtown, so there should be utility to the bridge too.
With that in mind, I'd nix Zeidler. The other two curving options aren't as bad, since they don't take you far off an ideal straight-line route.
I'll be disappointed if the Zeidler one is chosen. It looks neat, but it will also be a pain to walk across -- it makes the path much longer to cross the water. It falls victim to the same crappy pedestrian design that's so common here, in that designers think that people only walk/bicycle for pleasure, and not to actually get places. This is potentially the main path for thousands of people to and from downtown, so there should be utility to the bridge too.
With that in mind, I'd nix Zeidler. The other two curving options aren't as bad, since they don't take you far off an ideal straight-line route.
I totally agree with your #1 and #2 - I like the 'eye' feature on #2 in particular.
Really a very good set of proposals and it is 'fully funded' so may actually be built pretty much as designed!
I like that the Salmon Run design has a distinct modal separation already shown in renderings but I can still see many people stepping into the bike space for photo ops. Ultimately, any one of these is not going to be pleasant for cyclists, who will fair better on the Cherry St bridge or maybe even walking their bike over Keating.
Even with Humber Bay bridge’s width it turns into quite a slow zone in busy hours.
As much as I love the design - it does slightly clash with the "family" of other Portlands bridges, and I'd prefer something a little less flash and tall.