Yeah, just like he said... about a kilometre or so away. I think he's 100% correct. Grey, 100% correct eh? Get yourself a ruler. Are you telling me that there's nothing from Queen Street to the water? Because that's a kilometer.
And frankly, one could easily make the same "criticism", that almost every street in the city is not an "exciting, vibrant neighbourhood". Is Beverley an "exciting, vibrant neighbourhood?". Is Phoebe? Is Eastern? Is Wellesley? No, these are not primary commercial streets in our city. That doesn't make them wrong, or badly planned, or anything, except streets whose purpose is not primarily entertainment or commercial.
I have yet to visit a city where every street but a few are not "vibant, exciting, neighbourhoods". That's because for every street that is lined with cafes and stores and restaurants, and filled with people, there are about 138 that are lined with offices, homes, factories, and maybe the occasional store or restaurant here or there. These streets are commonly used mostly by those walking to their destinations. They, too, form part of the fabric of our city, and are not necessarily blunders or mistakes.
I would have more understanding of criticism of Bremner if people were either more judicious in their comments, or said "I believe Bremner would have been better had it been designed to be primarily a street for entertainment purposes". But here we have a street that is all of four or five blocks long, running alongside a stadium, a park, a convention centre, populated on its western end by residential, and with its eastern end completely under construction, and people are judging it by the yardstick of Queen Street!
I'm not saying that Bremner is perfect or could not have been better planned, but get a grip.