bilked
Senior Member
I fell in for the renders too. Assuming we’re nearing the finish, I’m not really seeing an improvement over
a space I always liked.
a space I always liked.
Last edited:
Why spend so much the hyperventilating about something that simply is not close enough to completion to be sure about yet?!The whole purpose of this project was to make a major esthetic statement. The colour, shape, materials, they all look, at this stage, quite a bit different than as billed.
It may (or may not) be fair to suggest that people temper negativity about architectural expression/outcomes when projects have another purpose, such as delivering residential units in a city starved for housing, for example.
This isn’t that type of project. I’m sure interiors were modernized, but the whole point of all this was to look pretty. I’m finding it harder and harder to see how this turns around as it moves to completion. Millions of dollars of donor funds later, this thing is looking more like a cautionary tale.
But with that said, it’d be a timely one, as OCAD presently is giving due consideration to fucking up the perfect-as-is space below the Aesop building.
Because that's what UTers do?Why spend so much the hyperventilating about something that simply is not close enough to completion to be sure about yet?!
42