I think Apple normally likes historical buildings/landmarks, or ultra-modern dedicated structures.
The retail space under a condo doesn't fit. It's too...pedestrian.
There's little that's pedestrian about 1 Bloor East. Jus' sayin'.
42
I think Apple normally likes historical buildings/landmarks, or ultra-modern dedicated structures.
The retail space under a condo doesn't fit. It's too...pedestrian.
There's little that's pedestrian about 1 Bloor East. Jus' sayin'.
42
...If you google other Apple standalone flagships, they're not under condos. They're usually placed along streetwalls or are architectural marvels like the store on Fifth Avenue in NYC or the one in Shanghai.
I'd hardly call those stores "architectural marvels". They're nothing ore than gimmicky retail outlets.
I'd hardly call those stores "architectural marvels". They're nothing ore than gimmicky retail outlets.
Their Fifth Avenue store is the most photographed thing in New York City. Not only are their flagship stores beautiful and simplistic, they attract large crowds of people to wherever they set up. The crowds are young and usually have some money in wallets which is great!
Apple has stagnated since the death of Steve Jobs. An Apple store might not be that exciting to people in a few years.
More photographed than the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Brooklyn Bridge? I find that really hard to believe.
How?
There's little that's pedestrian about 1 Bloor East. Jus' sayin'.
42
What he's trying to say is that basically Apple designs their own stores strictly and similar to the rest. Moving into an glass enclosure like those renders wouldn't "look or feel" very Apple. If you google other Apple standalone flagships, they're not under condos. They're usually placed along streetwalls or are architectural marvels like the store on Fifth Avenue in NYC or the one in Shanghai.