Natika33
Active Member
I'm definitely happy for the Ontario Line, but have to doff my hat for the loss of not one, but two of my favourite mountain biking trails here (as well as all the trees and displaced wildlife, etc).
Oh boohoo, the horrors of building public transit.It looks like Belgium during World War I.
I don’t think anyone really decries some trees getting cut. But it’s a lot, and there’s a reasonable question to be asked if all of that was necessary. So - do they absolutely need to stage equipment there? Was there no other choice? If so - do they actually need that much space?Oh boohoo, the horrors of building public transit.
Oh boohoo, the horrors of building public transit.
Oh boohoo, the horrors of building public transit.
While those trails may have to be closed during the construction, I have little doubt that they won't be back after.I'm definitely happy for the Ontario Line, but have to doff my hat for the loss of not one, but two of my favourite mountain biking trails here (as well as all the trees and displaced wildlife, etc).
Many of the trees will for sure, but there is also going to be a requirement to maintain clearance around the guideway. Which means that there will be a permanent swath of tree-less-ness across both sections of the valley from now on.These tress once replanted won't be back to the same density for 30 years.
There is also going to be a requirement to maintain clearance around the guideway. Which means that there will be a permanent swath of tree-less-ness across both sections of the valley from now on.
Agree. You can certainly see that any of the other big bridges crossing the Don Valley.
We'll have to wait and see the satellite pics of the area during heavy construction to see if they were made the right decision.
The problem is that this decision (iirc) was made in response to local feedback because they wanted to minimize the amount of time the guideway spent above the street.Anyone who has tried to work with Metrolinx is well aware that there's little thought out environmental concern in what they do.
Look at Smalls Creek a few years ago. After the local uproar, it was amazing how many fewer trees they removed, especially on the south side.
I fail to see how this changes the ridership numbers since it still serves the same stations at roughly the same locations. The only possible way this can impact riders is if this route increases travel times by a minute, or makes riding the train slightly noisier, which is a concern but I don't find this likely.At best, this comment is exceedingly insensitive; but its also completely and utterly wrong.
The issue w/this project remains that it was designed and routed incorrectly. If this line follows Overlea and crossed the valley at that point and turns north at Overlea/DonMills You save hectares and hectares of nature, and not only do you still get the transit, you get a route with higher ridership that's more convenient to more people.
Brushing off people's concerns with extremely bad planning that does tangible environment damage in order to deliver a worse transit route is not a good look.