Noticed in the TPAP that Osgoode and Pape-Danforth are shown as + instead of a T shown in the April schematics... so that proves that station locations are / will be adjusted. Yonge-Queen / City Hall is shown in its original position.
 
Kitsune said:
Noticed in the TPAP that Osgoode and Pape-Danforth are shown as + instead of a T shown in the April schematics... so that proves that station locations are / will be adjusted. Yonge-Queen / City Hall is shown in its original position.
Click to expand...

At least with Osgoode as a + instead of a T pointing east it may close the gap enough that a future western extension won't need a midblock station between University and Spadina. With the Osgoode platform so far east, a John Station may have been required.
 
Reecemartin said:
Here you go, X interchange . .

https://imgur.com/a/vnvrl9N
vnvrl9N






vnvrl9N
Click to expand...
I wouldn't read much into that. It's a very schematic track diagram. The existing plans for the stations are very detailed and more likely to be correct.
 
... they are tentatively dual bore. The tunnel design contracts are underway and with a result due in 2019. There where mentions in the TPAP that the TTC was undecided about allowing the TBM's to go under Queen and Osgoode station.
 
Neutrino said:
Gotta love all those regulations and bureaucracy.
Click to expand...
As if the Minister wouldn't sign off on it.
As if the alignment wasn't known prior to starting the TPAP.
As if the alignment wasn't known for last, how many years??
But, at least, the consultants got paid and politicians got to autograph some papers.
 
When will construction begin? (This is - almost - a rhetorical question lmao)
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top