Tuscani01
Senior Member
I'm not sure why folks are up and arms against this already, there is nothing in the proposal so far that jumps out as a "bad thing" yet - frankly I think having the entire site open for development is the way to go, those who bid will clearly know various structures have a lot of history and removing them can only really be justified if something grand will replace them (and more so, without removing them, said grand vision couldn't be realized).
The fact there is no residential component is a huge relief in my mind, this is not a large area in the grand scheme of things, seeing space wasted on residential spaces would be a travesty (yes I use that word intentionally), I say this as given the market it'd be all to easy to plop down a few "high end" residential towers and waste say 1/3 of the site on said space which contributes nothing to the community, the province, and the country. Honestly I think a similar comment applies to office space ...
I would have loved to see the EX integrated into this proposal, one vision for the broader site would make sense here (though I can see the difficulties involved with that)
And to boot no Casino which many here don't want
.., it's laughable to see many individuals on UT on the edge with this announcement... i guess it's all about politics
Who exactly are these people against this, or on the edge over this?
I don't think any of the posts since it was announced show either of those. Sure, people are cautious still since we won't be seeing plans until later this year - but I don't think anyone is disappointed with the announcement. In fact, I think it was a better announcement than anyone was expecting.