I have been following this off-topic sub-thread.
I have considered the various posts.
I offer:
Art from any period or style can be quite appealing, to both the critical eye; and the masses.
But likewise.............most art, in any style, from any period; even that made by by so-called 'masters' can be pedestrian..........or....errr......regrettable.
Lets look at some crap from the renaissance period here:
A look at surprising missteps by revered artists, from Michelangelo to Munch.
www.artsy.net
Even the good stuff; which is to stay that which demonstrates a high degree of skill........may not always represent good (public) art, is so far as the public doesn't care for it.
Modern art, on the other hand, can inspire a special kind of hate. As seen here:
We've put together a list of 10 examples of public sculpture that people truly hated. Click and see for yourself.
news.artnet.com
*****
To bring the above back to Toronto..............
I'm a big supporter of artful design; be that in buildings, or water features, or interiors or in the form of art pieces such as windows, paintings, or sometimes, sculpture.
That said, I can't deny that Toronto has its share of public art that I feel adds to little to the public realm.
There is, I think, a bit more investment in quantity than quality; a bit too much (public) art that lacks some thing special about it, as would be perceived by a significant plurality of the public.
That doesn't mean everything needs to be done to mass taste; or at ridiculous scale.............just that........its contribution to public space should be noted by many, as opposed to few.
*****
I now end my part in this digression; and return this thread to its normally scheduled mix of Ewwwws (at most things Pinnacle) and ahhhs at the....pictures of an every rising structure.