does anyone know what the plans are (if any) for the surface parking lot south of Richmond above? Last i heard it was sold by the City. It would be nice for it to be filled in to revitalize that stretch.
 
Tuesday evening around 6:40PM:
20190829_111415.jpg
20190829_111454.jpg
20190829_111117.jpg
20190829_111329.jpg
 
interchange42 said:
We count to the top floor that regular people can visit, i.e. that there are suites on, residential or office, or amenities if there are amenities above the suites.

42
Click to expand...

Thanks 42. Guess they’ve got sick penthouse(s) like they did with 295 Adelaide on the top floor.
 
Curious - does the developer need to obtain some type of special variance to cantilever like that? Clever way to increase the floor plate but wondering if that requires any special consideration. thanks
 
Logan said:
Curious - does the developer need to obtain some type of special variance to cantilever like that? Clever way to increase the floor plate but wondering if that requires any special consideration. thanks
Click to expand...
I don't believe the cantilever encroaches beyond the buildings property line, so I'd assume not.
 
Yegger said:
does anyone know what the plans are (if any) for the surface parking lot south of Richmond above? Last i heard it was sold by the City. It would be nice for it to be filled in to revitalize that stretch.
Click to expand...
Am wondering the same thing. Hard to imagine a lot of that size, at that central location, has not received a proposal
 
My understanding is that the city never owned it. Joe Cressy at one point raised a motion at council for the city to expropriate it to create a park, but I believe they stopped pursuing that when the Rail Deck Park came around.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top