interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
25,278
Reaction score
26,980
City:
Toronto
I had no idea about this. That's yet another reason why I wouldn't ever live at that development; if Pemberton is too cheap to excavate all the contamination than i'd want no business in living in their cheap build.

And if developers in general are going to be cheap by going the membrane way (which will degrade over time) on contaminated sites instead of doing full-scale excavations, then i'll have no business with those select developers either.
Context did the same thing at Market Wharf, capping the site and building up instead of down. Urban Capital went up for River City 1, 2, and 3 as well, partly to cap the contaminates and partly to not breach the flood wall, and It has happened at some other projects as well. The City sees it as a safe way to deal with the contaminated soil (which otherwise might contaminate nearby areas during excavation through airborne particulate and vapours. Seems to be a safe way to deal with the issue. You just have to find somewhere else to safely store the excavate if you remove it, anyway, likely meaning capping it somewhere else.

42
 

Amare

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
4,195
Reaction score
5,880
Context did the same thing at Market Wharf, capping the site and building up instead of down. Urban Capital went up for River City 1, 2, and 3 as well, partly to cap the contaminates and partly to not breach the flood wall, and It has happened at some other projects as well. The City sees it as a safe way to deal with the contaminated soil (which otherwise might contaminate nearby areas during excavation through airborne particulate and vapours. Seems to be a safe way to deal with the issue. You just have to find somewhere else to safely store the excavate if you remove it, anyway, likely meaning capping it somewhere else.

42
Very interesting insights here, I didnt know about those either.

My main concern with capping is how long is the cap supposed to last before it's rendered ineffective and said contaminants start to leak through to the residences above. Especially on larger scale developments where it would be almost impractical to raze the whole thing down in order to deal with those contaminants. I dont expect developers to be particularly forthcoming about that kind of information, and they would try to downplay it as much as possible.
 

Red Mars

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
4,762
Reaction score
32,209
City:
Aarhus
Nov 12, 2021

802E7A8C-63E9-445F-A7AD-9A2C86A99DFC_1_201_a.jpeg



FA5B7591-6C64-458E-AB2E-38813342928C_1_201_a.jpeg



F0FB4662-8819-42E3-9493-485607B79132_1_201_a.jpeg



2A182DF4-1D19-41F6-97D7-12FE1DA4FCC7_1_201_a.jpeg



ADBDC349-B7E2-47AF-BDEF-99D46154C5F5_1_201_a.jpeg



3AAFE239-3C86-4518-8DA2-CC9CE2B1863F_1_201_a.jpeg
 

Top