Irishmonk
Senior Member
Architecture should be first - because it is the abstract, living, human thing that makes building worthwhile. It is evidence of how we view ourselves as a society. Aside from the use of it by people, it's the extra quality in a building that keeps it from just taking up space, and makes it lastingly generous. It needs to be included, because financial bottom lines will always try to get away with the least they can do, and by nature, squeeze out imagination. It doesn't mean a building has to be flighty, silly, ridiculous or unprofitable. Far from it. It means that a building worth putting up shows itself as such, and has some pride in it's show of that, however uniquely it does it.
Nicely put, CN. That would make a great mission statement for an architecture firm. (But only a good one, though, like Teeple or Shim-Sutcliffe.)