[AlvinofDiaspar]

Looks like they have used post-tensioning for the beams - don't seem to see that technique a lot here.

AoD

 

[torplanner]

North end now as tall as the topped out south end.

 

[innsertnamehere]

On to the tower floors.

 

[interchange42]

From yesterday:

42

 

[skycandy]

Poking up from RP's view...

 

[innsertnamehere]

BTW, the latest plans have this at 99m, not 112.

 

[interchange42]

Our earlier number came from the Planning Rationale document posted on the City's Application Information Centre page. I get 105.7 metres from the architectural plans submitted on October 9, 2015 as part of the Site Plan Approval. What's your source @innsertnamehere?

42

@DonValleyRainbow

 

[innsertnamehere]

Oops, I read the top level height, minus the mechanical penthouse.

 

[AlbertC]

Looking forward to how this one turns out.

 

[ProjectEnd]

 

[modernizt]

I'm worried about the lack of articulation of the facade. The drawings and renderings suggest a very shallow inset for windows on the building face, which creates a very 'flat affect'. The massing is quite heavy so some stronger articulation would have been ideal here.

 

[Edward Skira]

From the west.

 

[interchange42]

Yesterday, heading down Church:

42

 

[steveve]

Today:

 

[Rascacielo]

This evening