July 30
1103CD8B-5F11-48AD-9D1A-3260B3C8A230.jpeg


The SE and NW towers are starting to appear between the common courtyard with more podium floors still to come.

August 5
4AB32436-F72D-434D-BC8F-C9FCE3B89056.jpeg


7277474B-CB2D-48A1-A7BF-FD57C4DB04B6.jpeg


576A6E12-BEC0-40DA-9A04-89D309E85E3C.jpeg


51656BE3-F948-4A09-BB93-C7D5EB3B0179.jpeg


August 8
759B9D83-C095-4C12-9FFD-9552673A1AB2.jpeg


August 11

D717C345-C5E8-4D2F-BDD0-8444DCB9503B.jpeg


36A22A9C-8E86-40C0-B11C-33951AC4B0A8.jpeg


2CFD0D54-1AC5-467D-B363-7616427C5F51.jpeg


40591BD2-8BAB-4A3C-923D-509E01852E79.jpeg
 
Finally starting to see a clear visual of the bottom part of the two tower's angled floor plate starting to rise from the podium in the second last photo up above ! I hope the facade curtain wall of the towers turns out Allright !
 
Last edited:
Stupid question but the database design renders wander around so I confess I don't actually know what this tower looks like. Is it the second guy from the left? Thx.

24935-91807.jpeg

UT
It's the two on the right… but yeah, it's an older rendering, and they have never released clear final renderings of these towers.

42
 
Their latest Doc submitting to the city show a different design.
 
The 'bit old' 360 degree "views" on the project website made me smile... not only do they offer clear views to the northwest (where the 2 companion towers will be built), they neglected to mention a 312.50 m supertall plus 264 m and 217.00 m towers due west. Lake views and north views are truthful ;-)
 
It's more economical to build two skyscrapers than one supertall.
If the supertall you are alluding to is 448m (equivalent to SugarWharf D 230m + E 218m), I obviously agree.

For 300m supertall height fanboys (I'm guilty as charged), there have been some bitter pills to swallow like SugarWharf B proposed @ 299m and YSL @ 299m (a gaping partial excavation and uncertain future).

But Sam got his permit and skytower holes are being drilled, so yay.
 

Back
Top