UtakataNoAnnex said:
Thankfully this got built before the corrupting forces of Concord had their say...
Click to expand...
Honestly, there are at least a couple of buildings at CITY PLACE much better than this.
It means Concord is capable of building something good but due to corporate greed and lack of interest in aesthetics make them put up anything for sale
 
Last edited:
kweku said:
Honestly, there are at least a couple of buildings at CITY PLACE much better than this.
It means Concord is capable of building something good but due to corporate greed and lack of interest aesthetics make them put up anything for sale
Click to expand...

I do agree that there are indeed a handful of buildings at city place that are actually half decent and deserve more credit. But better than this ? In what sense and which specific buildings are you referring to as I find the attention to detail here is unrivaled when compared to city place.
 
kweku said:
Honestly, there are at least a couple of buildings at CITY PLACE much better than this.
It means Concord is capable of building something good but due to corporate greed and lack of interest aesthetics make them put up anything for sale
Click to expand...
At best, a stopped watch tells the right time twice a day...
 
Today. Unsympathetic treatment of the east side of the heritage home on Gloucester

0E0546D7-5E6C-4CC3-9BE4-FD39C1F99239.jpeg


1A595302-3FA4-451F-9E00-DD281E526066.jpeg
 
The tower seems largely complete but they don’t seem to have people moving in on any of the lower floors. Any ideas why, given how fast most condo towers seem to get occupied?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top