Undead
Senior Member
From Oxford's website:
- Thread starter Michael62
- Start date
C-mac
Senior Member
Woohooo! I have to be honest, I didn't thing was ever going to happen. I'm stoked!!I could have shared this earlier..........but as is often the case, its prudent for me to wait for the info to be somewhere in the public domain.
Which I noticed Oxford had done........
From said page:
View attachment 355366
For further clarity, the actual occupancy shows as one quarter earlier than I said (I understood fall)
View attachment 355367
See Timing above, bottom-right
innsertnamehere
Superstar
Hmm, what makes me think the tenant is someone Oxford recently sold a large chunk of New York City real estate to and is named after an impossibly large number?
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
I never claimed I expected to see 'em poke shoring beams by tomorrow...that was more hopeful thinking with a dash of impatience on my part.
Although, it goes without saying that I hope they get their paper work lined up before they do anything...or will not end well for 'em.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
I'm not sure if @Northern Light has any hidden insight in terms of someone within Oxford, but no one I know has heard anything about a lease here. It's my read from the website that it's just an ambitious goalpost.
Northern Light
Superstar
I am not aware of any firm lease in place.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Yeah, confirmed. No lease here yet. Enjoy the renders for now!
Pinski
New Member
261.9m to top of the trellis
300m to top of lightening rod
300m to top of lightening rod
The Preservationist
Active Member
Hey I just looked at skyscraperpage.com and they have The Hub height listed as 257.9 m but do not provide a spire height, only listed as an antenna. As the "antenna" is free standing shouldn't it be listed as a spire instead? Perhaps I don't understand the rules.
cd concept
Senior Member
It bothers me that these office towers that use the Little Rascal's Alfalfa hair extension method! To claim a certain height status that nowone can ever view from!
Koops65
Senior Member
The "spire" is called a lightning rod by the developer, so that puts it in the same category as an antenna, which means it doesn't qualify as an official height.
The Preservationist
Active Member
I'm making an assumption that the boxy component on the lightning rod is for corporate signage. If that is the case how would that be considered?
C-mac
Senior Member
If you're talking about Google, that's interesting because look at the colours on the logo:
Remind you of another company that uses those colours?
I realize google has their own building going up King, but I thought I read Oxford sold a large chunk of New York Real Estate to them so that's why I'm guessing you're talking about google.
rbt
Senior Member
If you're talking about Google, that's interesting because look at the colours on the logo:
Remind you of another company that uses those colours?
Google, Microsoft, Nintendo, and Ebay all share that colour scheme. Probably more.
Burger King gets close (needs Green). Apple has purple in addition to the others in their 1970's logo.
Oh, and the Olympics! Those colours are outlined in black!
Last edited: