UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
...and I thought mine's where bad. >.<This is the most nonsensical comment I've ever seen on this forum. Doesn't warrant explanation.
...and I thought mine's where bad. >.<This is the most nonsensical comment I've ever seen on this forum. Doesn't warrant explanation.
For good or bad, this article is not the first to be saying that regarding the height change. But the two things I gleamed off of said article that maybe at play here: First that there was an indication of significant numbers of buyers who got spooked and bailed over this, so they don't have as much of the monied clientele in the pocket as they did before the insolvency shite hit the fan with Mizrahi. And secondly, the extra floors may have fell upon an extended contract that hasn't fully been sussed out or agreed upon yet. Meaning, it could be subject to cutting with little on no penalties on the road to recuperation and "let's get it done with!", or something like that...
This is not to say any this is true or factual here, rather how I am reading it and for what that's worth. As well as to say, I hope this all incorrect and they still going with the 91 in the end floors. But I guess we shall see.
Truncates is also a poor term here, as the crown will remain unaffected regardless of what height the building is decided upon in the end. You can safely go with a tad shorter, but stubby or truncated it will most certainly not be.
Thank you because i am deaf person... that is my view of point! You need to respect!This is the most nonsensical comment I've ever seen on this forum. Doesn't warrant explanation.
You can still read, right?Thank you because i am deaf person... that is my view of point! You need to respect!
You can still read, right?
Some industry sources claim that Apple is still a possibility. It’s not over yet on that front.In retrospect, the fatal decision made on this project was to have a column-free triple-height first-floor retail space to accommodate an Apple store. The complexities of building a super-tall tower over a column-free first floor probably doubled the cost of the tower and quadrupled the timeline and for what? In the end, Apple abandoned the project. Who is going to go into that first-floor retail space? A bank (TD?)? McDonalds? Shoppers Drug Mart? Winners? Dollarama? Who? Not only did this requirement add to the complexity and cost of the tower it also drastically reduced the attractiveness and convenience of the tower for potential condo owners who by necessity have to take an elevator up to a sky lobby to transfer to another bank of elevators up to their condo. No possibility of a private elevator for buyers of Penthouses costing over $20 million! If you could afford $20 million for a condo (or home), would you buy into a project like this?
They may return if there is a good deal on the credit back...why not..Some industry sources claim that Apple is still a possibility. It’s not over yet on that front.
The crown is what I like most about this building its very unique I would rather have the crown than the extra floorsWould they have to submit new permits to scrap the crown in favor of a cheaper flat roof/mechanical (at 328 m) , and therefore be able to squeeze in more floors of small mid-market investor boxes?
To me , this would make the more economic sense than capping at 306m, although I hope it's still 328 m and retaining the crown.