slicecom
Active Member
There's not much to look at besides back painted spandrel, but it is more inviting than the completely unshaded stretch along The Esplanade in the heat of the sun during the day.well that looks super uninviting
There's not much to look at besides back painted spandrel, but it is more inviting than the completely unshaded stretch along The Esplanade in the heat of the sun during the day.well that looks super uninviting
You must admit it is in tune with the rest of this hulking edifice!well that looks super uninviting
Actually, this is planting along Lower Sherbourne (top photo) and Princess (lower one) but ... Good to see but REALLY disappointed they were not forced to plant along The Esplanade, it's a barren desert.Just to add to the photo above. Trees planned for along Frederick. Taken 28 July.
View attachment 495725View attachment 495726
the esplanade park across the street (where people are far more likely to traverse instead of the north sidewalk) has beautiful, large mature trees. hardly a barren desert.Actually, this is planting along Lower Sherbourne (top photo) and Princess (lower one) but ... Good to see but REALLY disappointed they were not forced to plant along The Esplanade, it's a barren desert.
In addition the City has a plan to revitalize David Crombie Park.the esplanade park across the street (where people are far more likely to traverse instead of the north sidewalk) has beautiful, large mature trees. hardly a barren desert.
i don't think it's a huge loss to not have trees along the esplanade portion of this site
That block of The Esplanade gets lots of sun and planting trees helps to reduce heat (apart from looking nice!). It was NOT impossible to plant there - as stated in the Site Plan - but would have cost some $$ to relocate conduits. Pemberton were too mean to pay and the City were too spineless to insist!the esplanade park across the street (where people are far more likely to traverse instead of the north sidewalk) has beautiful, large mature trees. hardly a barren desert.
i don't think it's a huge loss to not have trees along the esplanade portion of this site
I could be wrong but perhaps part of the reason more people walk on the south sidewalk of The Esplanade is BECAUSE it has "beautiful large mature trees" and the north sidewalk does not have any. Just my opinion.the esplanade park across the street (where people are far more likely to traverse instead of the north sidewalk) has beautiful, large mature trees. hardly a barren desert.
i dont think its a huge loss to not have trees along the esplanade portion of this site
I could be wrong but perhaps part of the reason more people walk on the south sidewalk of The Esplanade is BECAUSE it has "beautiful large mature trees" and the north sidewalk does not have any. Just my opinion.
Doing some thread catchup and you are of course entitled to your own opinion, but you like this more than the well!?Parts of me like this better than the Well. Less glass is always a positive for me, and as I've mentioned serval times I love how dense it makes this area feel now.
Doing some thread catchup and you are of course entitled to your own opinion, but you like this more than the well!?
Part of me genuinely thinks this is some elaborate ruse where you just keep doubling down and waiting for someone to call your bluff and then at the very end you’ll reveal you’ve hated this project all along.