TRONto
Active Member
Interesting. You are right that there could be a strong NIMBY contingent even though they would strongly benefit from a tunnel.Given the history, I am *sure* the most vocal residents would have a fit. But discounting the NIMBYies, a tunnel would take away the best asset - the view - from this route. Having to walk/ride through a tunnel sounded like an charmless way to access an island park.
For all the inconveniences of the ferry, what it does offer is connection from the centre of the city that can't be replicated easily by a fixed link. IMO, the fixed links at both ends (in the long run) serves more as a way to complete the circuit of green space, and not so much so as an easy way to access the park from the core.
AoD
Agreed that a tunnel or bridge is a charmless way to access the island vs the ferry. It does a much better job with handling the capacity though. No waiting around for a ferry. I think the city would still need to run the ferry though based on the location of the tunnel and centre island. It would take the edge off the ferries.