[AlbertC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1107706205575790593

 

[ushahid]

y does it look like 150 m in the renders?

 

[someMidTowner]

y does it look like 150 m in the renders?

Perspective. The towers in the foreground are about 250 metres closer to the viewer than Union Centre, so the rendering seems accurate to me

 

[cd concept]

Perspective. The towers in the foreground are about 250 metres closer to the viewer than Union Centre, so the rendering seems accurate to me

The Union Center is over a hundred meters higher than the Delta hotel . And it's just on the other side of the narrow rail yard . That's over 300 feet or 30 storeys more if the floor plates are at 10 feet . shouldn't this building be a little more higher in the picture even with the perspective mode ?

 

[DonValleyRainbow]

I can't believe the impact this would have on the skyline. Dat width. Dunno if it's a good or bad thing, just saying it really sticks out relative to its neighbours looking at it from the north or south.

 

[Yegger]

I'm disappointed that this is BIG's product . The gimmicks and greenery are there to distract from the fact it's essentially a glass box that blends into the wall of green-blue in south core.

 

[rbt]

What is the sense of the likelihood of finding sufficient tenants to get this off the ground in the near-term (given competing buildings going up)?

Very good if we go a couple years without a round of layoffs/recession.

The location is very strong due to distance to Union Station, but a direct/short connection to TorIX (Toronto Internet Exchange) also makes it unusually appealing to data heavy tech applications. Everything else being equal, this location should have slightly lower vacancy rates than typical.

 

[interchange42]

Everything else being equal, this location should have slightly lower vacancy rates than typical.

Every Toronto office tower has slightly lower vacancy rates than typical.

42

 

[rbt]

Every Toronto office tower has slightly lower vacancy rates than typical.

True, and I expect it'll be even lower than that unless the floorplates are complete crap or something.

 

[interchange42]

And I meant that office towers in downtown Toronto already have negligible vacancy rates, they can't really get lower.

42

 

[jje1000]

I'm disappointed that this is BIG's product . The gimmicks and greenery are there to distract from the fact it's essentially a glass box that blends into the wall of green-blue in south core.

Yup, the trees are really more or less architectural parsley.

 

[christiesplits]

I'm disappointed that this is BIG's product . The gimmicks and greenery are there to distract from the fact it's essentially a glass box that blends into the wall of green-blue in south core.

Well said. Minus the shrubs, this is the typical Toronto glass box.

 

[cd concept]

I thought the greenery on top of the building actually looked pretty decent when I watched it on Koop's fly by. If the Union Park development from Oxford Properties ever decides to enhance the top of their buildings with greenery. It could really enhance the CN Tower corridor area complimenting the tower. Making a great tourism photo for the city!

 

[Contra]

The wide floorplate reminds me a lot of 22 Bishopsgate in London. It's a honking big building - but the quality of the build really elevates it. While this isn't terribly "exciting" the fact that they are at least adding some interest to it with green walls, a staggered roofline and the lighting takes this well well well above your typical "Toronto office tower". To call it typical seems a little ignorant to some of the finer details here!

 

[NeilV]

Does the height increase mean they'll need to apply for rezoning?