IMG_20131005_180551.jpg


IMG_20131005_180620.jpg



IMG_20131005_180814.jpg



IMG_20131005_180817.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20131005_180551.jpg
    IMG_20131005_180551.jpg
    90.8 KB · Views: 1,294
  • IMG_20131005_180620.jpg
    IMG_20131005_180620.jpg
    90.3 KB · Views: 1,296
  • IMG_20131005_180814.jpg
    IMG_20131005_180814.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 1,284
  • IMG_20131005_180817.jpg
    IMG_20131005_180817.jpg
    94 KB · Views: 1,263
IMG_20140116_111558.jpg



IMG_20140116_111652.jpg



IMG_20140116_111703.jpg




IMG_20140116_111718.jpg




IMG_20140116_111752.jpg




IMG_20140116_111912.jpg




IMG_20140116_111934.jpg




IMG_20140116_112101.jpg





IMG_20140116_112117.jpg




IMG_20140116_112412.jpg



IMG_20140116_112440.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140116_111558.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111558.jpg
    81.1 KB · Views: 1,242
  • IMG_20140116_111652.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111652.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 1,265
  • IMG_20140116_111703.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111703.jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 1,230
  • IMG_20140116_111718.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111718.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 1,231
  • IMG_20140116_111752.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111752.jpg
    89.3 KB · Views: 1,258
  • IMG_20140116_111912.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111912.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 1,219
  • IMG_20140116_111934.jpg
    IMG_20140116_111934.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 1,238
  • IMG_20140116_112101.jpg
    IMG_20140116_112101.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 1,205
  • IMG_20140116_112117.jpg
    IMG_20140116_112117.jpg
    87.4 KB · Views: 1,240
  • IMG_20140116_112412.jpg
    IMG_20140116_112412.jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 1,204
  • IMG_20140116_112440.jpg
    IMG_20140116_112440.jpg
    88.9 KB · Views: 1,201
Pallid today:

P1380159.jpg


P1380167.jpg


P1380168.jpg


P1380171.jpg


P1380177.jpg


P1380178.jpg


P1380180.jpg


P1380184.jpg


P1380185.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • P1380159.jpg
    P1380159.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 1,090
  • P1380167.jpg
    P1380167.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 1,113
  • P1380168.jpg
    P1380168.jpg
    92 KB · Views: 1,110
  • P1380171.jpg
    P1380171.jpg
    81.4 KB · Views: 1,096
  • P1380177.jpg
    P1380177.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 1,094
  • P1380178.jpg
    P1380178.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 1,086
  • P1380180.jpg
    P1380180.jpg
    101.6 KB · Views: 1,104
  • P1380184.jpg
    P1380184.jpg
    101.6 KB · Views: 1,084
  • P1380185.jpg
    P1380185.jpg
    103.4 KB · Views: 1,085
I understand some people not liking the location but the feel around the base of the building should be pretty good. I personally like all the different colours of these and other buildings in the area.
 
It's not beautiful, but it fits in perfectly with it's surroundings.

I'd like to argue the second phrase. The first of your photos shows the 70s building with the staggered balconies to the northeast. Oh if only the Pemberton development here had taken its cue from the more forward looking architecture displayed there. Port Royal instead is a throwback to mismatched historical references that should never be cobbled into one building, let alone a whole complex. Pemberton has really picked up their game at U Condos, and are employing better architectural firms on some of their forthcoming central city projects, but all that can be said for Port Royal is that this is it, the scab can't get any bigger.

42
 
Last edited:
I'd like to argue the second phrase. The first of your photos shows the 70s building with the staggered balconies to the northeast. Oh if only the Pemberton development here had taken its cue from the more forward looking architecture displayed there. Port Royal instead is a throwback to mismatched historical references that should never be cobbled into one building, let alone a whole complex. Pemberton has really picked up their game at U Condos, and are employing better architectural firms on some of their forthcoming central city projects, but all that can be said for Port Royal is that this is it, the scab can't get any bigger.

42

Port Royal Place is part of Marco Muzzo's legacy. Marc seems to have more interest in architecture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The whole thing is a disaster. It's hardly better than the dilapidated old dump of a high school that occupied the site previously. You know, for one of Toronto's 5 city centres, this part of Etobicoke really deserves better than all the garbage that keeps getting dumped on it.
 
The whole thing is a disaster. It's hardly better than the dilapidated old dump of a high school that occupied the site previously. You know, for one of Toronto's 5 city centres, this part of Etobicoke really deserves better than all the garbage that keeps getting dumped on it.

This is what lower income areas get, for being lower income areas.
 
?

Some of the Mabelle Avenue buildings have some income challenges, but the neighbourhood as a whole is not a "lower income area".

42
 

Back
Top