I found these pics by NOW Magazine of what the square used to look like.

Yonge-Eg.JPG


Yonge-Eg2.JPG


Yonge-Eg3.JPG


Yonge-Eg4.JPG


Yonge-Eg5.JPG
 

Attachments

  • Yonge-Eg.JPG
    Yonge-Eg.JPG
    82.8 KB · Views: 1,197
  • Yonge-Eg2.JPG
    Yonge-Eg2.JPG
    116.4 KB · Views: 1,207
  • Yonge-Eg3.JPG
    Yonge-Eg3.JPG
    111 KB · Views: 1,198
  • Yonge-Eg4.JPG
    Yonge-Eg4.JPG
    134.3 KB · Views: 1,181
  • Yonge-Eg5.JPG
    Yonge-Eg5.JPG
    132.2 KB · Views: 1,196
From earlier this evening:

DSC01238.jpg


DSC01239.jpg


DSC01240.jpg


DSC01241.jpg


DSC01242.jpg


Kid taking tickets said he heard the new VIP cinemas wouldn't be open until the Christmas season. Ehh, what does he know?

42
 

Attachments

  • DSC01238.jpg
    DSC01238.jpg
    404 KB · Views: 979
  • DSC01239.jpg
    DSC01239.jpg
    244.8 KB · Views: 937
  • DSC01240.jpg
    DSC01240.jpg
    334.3 KB · Views: 939
  • DSC01241.jpg
    DSC01241.jpg
    203.2 KB · Views: 961
  • DSC01242.jpg
    DSC01242.jpg
    195.1 KB · Views: 960
My goodness can we please get that public square back? This has got to be one of the worst ideas that have ever come into fruition in this city. It wouldve been better off in the "proposed but never built" category.
 
The puke green spandrel really sucks. Can't say this 'adds' to the intersection. It doesn't help that the Pickle Barrel sign is about as cheap looking as it can get.
 
Wouldn't it be the construction hoarding that's sucking the life out of the intersection. How can one tell when it isn't done yet.
Really? You think when they remove the hoarding this thing is going to suddenly be a good piece of design / people space?
 
Really? You think when they remove the hoarding this thing is going to suddenly be a good piece of design / people space?

It may not look like good architecture in your eyes but it could still work as a people place depending on how it meets the sidewalk.
 
My goodness can we please get that public square back?

I like the design more than most here but agree that the public square was better use of space

Regardless of what one thinks of this architecture or the use of this space, let's be clear on one point. It was never a public square. It wasn't publicly owned (I appreciate that you might have been using the term "public square" loosely, as a square used by the public, but it typically means public ownership). While it was privately owned open space, there was no requirement on the landowner to maintain it as such. Short of expropriation, this was always going to happen eventually.
 

Back
Top