News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.2K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

M

mpolo2

Guest
From the Vancouver Sun (btw Surrey is to Vancouver as probably Brampton is to Toronto)


www.canada.com/vancouver/...98ff2eb45e

Towering plan set for Surrey
Would be Canada's highest at 81 storeys

Lori Culbert
Vancouver Sun


October 27, 2005

CREDIT: Vancouver Sun Graphic
20 STOREYSCENTRAL CITY COMPLEXCurrently Surrey's tallest tower


CREDIT: Vancouver Sun Graphic
48 STOREYS, 491 FEETWall CentreCurrently Vancouver's tallest building


SURREY - Preliminary plans are underway to construct Canada's tallest highrise in Surrey -- a massive 81-storey building with residential, commercial and hotel space, Mayor Doug McCallum says.

"This will be the tallest building in Canada," McCallum told The Vancouver Sun in an exclusive interview Wednesday.

"It's 81 floors. That's four times the height of Central City, which is the tallest building [in Surrey] now."

If built, the project would be much taller than Vancouver's current tallest building, the 48-storey Wall Centre, and the skyscraper that's going to take over that title, the 60-storey Shangri-La, once it's completed in about 2008.

First Canadian Place in Toronto says on its website that it is now the country's tallest highrise, at 72 storeys. The CN Tower in Toronto remains Canada's tallest free-standing structure, stretching 1,815 feet (553 metres).

The proposed 81-storey Surrey building to be located near the King George SkyTrain station would, at about 900 feet, be four times higher than the tallest structure in Surrey right now: the 20-storey Central City office tower, attached to a shopping mall and an SFU campus, on 102 Avenue.

McCallum claimed architectural drawings, financing and other details are being finalized, and added the property is already zoned for this type of mixed-use building. He said the only approval required from council will be building permits, and he did not anticipate its unprecedented height would delay the project.

"I expect that it's going to move very quickly, I really do. We could very well see it starting in the ground in the next six months."

McCallum, who has been mayor for nine years, is facing his toughest challenge for re-election yet in this year's municipal election in Surrey, a city often criticized for urban sprawl, business parks and monster homes.

Critics frequently say that Surrey's land-use strategy contradicts the GVRD's Livable Region Strategic Plan, which encourages cities to plan new developments near town centres and transit hubs.

McCallum counters that this proposed project and others -- such as five highrise towers being built in Whalley, and permits issued for five more -- are proof his city is planning and developing responsibility.

But Dianne Watts, McCallum's main challenger for the mayor's chair, cautioned that this highrise will not be a done deal until an application for a building permit is presented to city hall.

"We continually talk to developers and investors with regards to building towers in the downtown core, and some come to fruition and some don't," she said, adding these projects are often years in the making.

McCallum says the people behind the proposed building include architect James Cheng, who designed Shangri-La, and Jung Ventures, the Korean-based developers involved in the five-tower Central City residential project -- just west of where the new highrise would be located.

Jung Ventures president CEO Miyung-Soo Jung did not return phone messages Wednesday.

Two-term Coun. Bob Bose said there are problems with the proposal, including zoning bylaws that require the distance between the property line and the front of the building to be at least 50 per cent of the height of the structure.

It's absurd. There would have to be massive variances permitted to the zoning. To achieve something of that height, without variances, would require a site of at least a square kilometre in size," he said.

Bose, a member of Surrey's new opposition party and a long-time foe of McCallum, said a phone call from The Sun late Wednesday was the first he'd heard of the project.

"So here we go again with the mayor making grand announcements on the eve of the election, on matters that have never been brought to council," Bose said.

He estimated an 81-storey building would be about 900 feet high, and that the building site is 300 feet above sea level -- putting the proposed skyscraper "perilously close to interfering with controlled airspace" for planes flying over Surrey en route to Vancouver airport.

Bose says he put forward a motion, which was not supported by councillors with McCallum's centre-right party, for Surrey to develop a plan to ensure it is paying attention to the quality of design of new towers.

"What is troubling me is that McCallum has never seen a high-rise he couldn't love," Bose said.

50816-15914.jpg
 
Isn't FCP closer to 1000 feet? How will this be taller beyond having more floors?
 
I like tall buildings but Surrey can have this one. I am waiting for 70 story towers to take over Don Mills.
 
This should probably be moved to the Buildings section as it has nothing to do with Toronto projects or construction.
 
Sounds like Surrey's mayor is talking off the top of his head here. I dodn't think there's anything finalized height-wise on this yet.
 
BTW - that pic is of the developer's current project - Infinity - which is one of 5 36 storey towers beng built next to King George Skytrain Station.

pop_canada_20050104-img05.jpg
 
wow tihs seems almost absurd.
You are right though...at 900 feet it is well short of FCP's 978 feet and the proposed Trump and Sapphire towers.

The thing that struck me was the variance bylaw. This is a traditional suburban technique to keep low density development and that is the biggest absurdity of all. The building has to be set back from the street at 50% of its height? That will prevent any kind of dense textured urban environment but will encourage parking lots and windswept plazas!
 
I'll file this in the "not gonna happen" bin and we'll leave it there.
 
Sounds like the Dubai/Shanghai type of thinking has started to creep into the minds of suburban governments and developers in Canada (and I hope that I won't be misinterpreted as saying Canadian suburbs are turning into little Dubais). The idea is that megaprojects like tall towers are status symbols that will transform bedroom suburbs into real cities, and as such, suburbs should try to get them at all costs.

For Surrey, there might be other reasons for a tall tower to go there: maybe there was no way for the tower to be able to fit into nearby Vancouver's skyline, or maybe the tower wasn't able to gain approval from the urban design panel, so they had to settle for building it in Surrey instead.
 
900 ft in Surrey? It'd stick out like a sore thumb. But I like the design at least. Why so tall, is it all or nothing? I would reckon there will be a lot of NIMBYs who will scuttle this project.
 
81-story high-rise a no go for Surrey
Nov, 23 2005 - 8:40 AM

SURREY/CKNW(AM980) - An 81-story high-rise planned for Surrey is a non-starter. So is a 50-million-dollar contribution to a new hospital.

Those were both promised by Doug McCallum when he was mayor of Surrey, but now that Dianne Watts is mayor of Surrey, she's put the kibosh on them.
On the hospital issue, she says they need to wait for recommendations in a provincial government report on Surrey Memorial.
She also says there hasn't been an application for a high-rise.

However Councilor Marvin Hunt, a member of McCallum's party, SET, says the hospital proposal is still alive.
Hunt goes on to say SET has six members on council, and it's still part of their party's agenda.
 

Back
Top