CplKlinger
Senior Member
I think council was just put off by the cost. They considered doing it as part of the Valley Line work, but that never happened.Whatever happened to this project?
I think council was just put off by the cost. They considered doing it as part of the Valley Line work, but that never happened.Whatever happened to this project?
Unfortunately my answer to that would be, do you think the city would actually commission something edgy like that?Is that an “designed” spray paint job at the top there? Please say it’s supposed to be there? Please don’t say it’s already been tagged…..
I remember Sydney's LRT because when it opened it was slower than the bus it replaced!Sydney and Canberra also have similar LRT systems (Sydney even has a similar atrocity to the Whyte crossing where their Southeast line branches), and they haven't seen the need to add crossing arms.
That said, winter is the real test. I'm worried about the section of 83 St in front of Idylwylde, it's on a curve, the turning lane is impossible to see under snow and there are tons of kids / elderly who cross there.
One thing I'll say though, I really like Sydney's choice to turn their CBD LRT thoroughfare into a pedestrian mall. It would be pretty sweet if Council could do something similar for 102 Ave.