Rising Mist
Active Member
That would be my bet as well. Sight lines aren't really much of an issue there.My bet is on Surrey.
That would be my bet as well. Sight lines aren't really much of an issue there.My bet is on Surrey.
I myself never use Emporis as a guide to get info of skyscrapers, I found its data and especially the photos are terribly outdated. Before I even joined any skyscrapers forums I visited that site on a regular basic to see the construction progress of Shangri La hotel in Vancouver, but I kept seeing the same images for a month or two before they finally got updated, so I decided to visit the construction site and took the photos myself.
The best way to compare the two cities is to use their metro area rather than the city itself, but unfortunately there is no reliable source I can find so far, but my estimation of the number of highrise construction in the great Vancouver area is between 60 and 100. Toronto always has more than Vancouver simply due to it has a much bigger metro region.
Thanks for this. I ended up finding something related in another forum, and I was astounded to see just how many 100+m buildings Vancouver is building (3rd in North America, after Toronto and NYC). I guess that answers my question; Vancouver is OBJECTIVELY building a huge amount of highrises, it's not just a perception. Link to said thread: Best Anglo-Saxon skylines thread ( USA, Canada, Australia, NZ and UK )
Haha, I was the one created that thread in SSC (my username is Yellow Fever) and I did read isaidso's post , according to the data he provided the number of highrises under construction is obviously within the city limit and not the metro area and therefore you see Toronto has 117 while there is only 32 in Vancouver. If we include other cities in the metro region, in Burnaby alone I could count at least 20 highrise construction sites easily.
Actually, the easiest way to find out how many highrise construction in metro Vancouver is count how many highrise construction threads we have here, we might not have 100 percent coverage but at least you would have a rough idea.