Red October
Senior Member
Seriously the "problems" with St. Clair are waaaaaayyyyy overblown.
We've had lengthy discussion on this topic, either in this, the Finch West or the Transit Fantasy Maps thread. I wish I knew which pages, because people posted rather detailed route options. Would be nice to review them again.What would you all think of joining Crosstown W and Finch? What route would you think would work?
Seriously the "problems" with St. Clair are waaaaaayyyyy overblown.
We've had lengthy discussion on this topic, either in this, the Finch West or the Transit Fantasy Maps thread. I wish I knew which pages, because people posted rather detailed route options. Would be nice to review them again.
Having read Ed Levy's book, it has become evident that all our transit plans are rehashes of things that were proposed decades before.It just hit me that a Finch-Eglinton LRT would be a resurrection of the Etobickoe RT from the 70s (SRTs lost cousin)
Other than there isn't a single piece of shared alignment ... I thought the Etobicoke RT was up the hydro alignment near Kipling north of the 401, a short spur into Pearson, and then along the , then along the Finch Hydro alignment. I don't think any of it was on Eglinton, Finch, or any of the proposed Eglinton LRT alignments into Pearson.It just hit me that a Finch-Eglinton LRT would be a resurrection of the Etobickoe RT from the 70s (SRTs lost cousin)
Other than there isn't a single piece of shared alignment ... I thought the Etobicoke RT was up the hydro alignment near Kipling north of the 401, a short spur into Pearson, and then along the , then along the Finch Hydro alignment. I don't think any of it was on Eglinton, Finch, or any of the proposed Eglinton LRT alignments into Pearson.
its the car drivers and the issue with left-hand turns and how long it takes at a stop due to having the u-turns, etc, etcWe've had lengthy discussion on this topic, either in this, the Finch West or the Transit Fantasy Maps thread. I wish I knew which pages, because people posted rather detailed route options. Would be nice to review them again.
I used it for the first time in ages the other week. It was an exceptional experience compared to most other transit in Toronto. I don't know why anyone would complain about it.
Having read Ed Levy's book, it has become evident that all our transit plans are rehashes of things that were proposed decades before.
Only 'new' idea that I can think of is a subway under Don Mills.
Having read Ed Levy's book, it has become evident that all our transit plans are rehashes of things that were proposed decades before.
Only 'new' idea that I can think of is a subway under Don Mills.
isn't the outer U basically SmartTrack?Toronto's plans over the decades have generally included an inner U, outer U, Bloor-Danforth rapid transit, and more recently (and by recently, I mean 70s), Eglinton rapid transit. Everything is in place now but that damn outer U.
isn't the outer U basically SmartTrack?
Very true. And the project manager was actually the City, not the TTC as I recall. Streetcar surface projects are generally managed by the City's transportation department.By the way, he original scope of the St. Clair ROW came in approximately as budgeted, if I recall correctly. That's commendable considering all the crap the TTC had to put up with from the community and Hydro. It was all the stuff that was added on to the project by Councillors that made it go "over budget"




