TheTigerMaster
Superstar
Maybe there is an "UP" button on the operator's panel, and the sucker just bursts up from under the pavement and stops: "Ta-da......"
No?
- Paul
I'd pay a decent bit of money to watch that show
Maybe there is an "UP" button on the operator's panel, and the sucker just bursts up from under the pavement and stops: "Ta-da......"
No?
- Paul
We can safely say Bombardier wanted to save on costs by manufacturing parts in Mexico and it backfired big time.
Shame on the TTC for not requiring production at proven plants. When the federal government orders warships, they require all production in Canada. The GTA's combined outstanding orders with Bombardier are equal to the warships contracts in size.We can safely say Bombardier wanted to save on costs by manufacturing parts in Mexico and it backfired big time.
That's most likely for national security reasons, and has nothing to do with contract size.Shame on the TTC for not requiring production at proven plants. When the federal government orders warships, they require all production in Canada. The GTA's combined outstanding orders with Bombardier are equal to the warships contracts in size.
I'd pay a decent bit of money to watch that show
You do remember the Feds said FU to Toronto/David Miller when they tried to get the feds to fund these streetcars. What you're suggesting is to jack up the prices of the bid so TTC can't even afford the streetcars. We would have gotten zero streetcars if they requested 100% Canadian content. The military is different, they don't want their secrets leaking out of the country.Shame on the TTC for not requiring production at proven plants. When the federal government orders warships, they require all production in Canada. The GTA's combined outstanding orders with Bombardier are equal to the warships contracts in size.
A lot of people here has been suggested that TTC should have gone with an more expensive option but in 2009 TO was poor as ****. The contract wouldn't have gone through if the city decided not to take on more loans.
are you saying that the lowest bid needs to get the tender otherwise the lowest bidder can sue? If the city felt the higher bid was more reflective of the true cost and selected that how could Bombardier sue? When a tender is put together there are many requirements written into a tender prior to companies bidding. Price is not the only thing.And a valid and winnable lawsuit from Bombardier if the city failed to follow bidding rules and went with the higher bidder. Also, Miller was elected largely because of the MFP scandal which was caused almost entirely by not following the cities tendering practices.
Gonna be one of the final pictures we will have for the Eglinton bus bays.Several posts back there was some uncertainty as to the current status of the old bus terminal. Stopped by this morning for a look
View attachment 74147
Gonna be one of the final pictures we will have for the Eglinton bus bays.
If the bid was to request for the lowest bidder and if the lowest bidder followed all the rules and didn't get the tender, they can pretty much sue.are you saying that the lowest bid needs to get the tender otherwise the lowest bidder can sue? If the city felt the higher bid was more reflective of the true cost and selected that how could Bombardier sue? When a tender is put together there are many requirements written into a tender prior to companies bidding. Price is not the only thing.
This isn't some clapboard shack they're tearing down. Do you realize the size of this site? There has to be a lot of planning and coordination to do this the proper and safe way. You can't just go in there and start smashing away. There are underground tunnels, utilities and god knows what is under there. So they say they are starting demolition. They have. It starts with careful planning. And, thank god for unions.Nice....so all they did for over month since they announced on their site:http://www.thecrosstown.ca/news-media/whats-new/demolition-work-for-future-eglinton-station-0
was park a few sea containers and a trailer...Even if they can blame the unseasonably cold weather for not digging at least they can tear down the structures. I'm pretty sure you dont need 15C weather to do that..... Now I'm beginning to understand why its going to take until 2021....this is a clear example of the inefficiencies in their construction scheduling.
Either that or theres a serious disconnect between them and PR. Either way... we're still on the hook to pay for a trailer sittting in an empty lot with no activity/progress going on.
Whoever is responsible for making everyone who relies on crosstown.ca believe that progress is being made whether its PR or the construction manager really ought to be disciplined/fired, but thats not going to happen.....unions/govt contracts....
This isn't some clapboard shack they're tearing down. Do you realize the size of this site? There has to be a lot of planning and coordination to do this the proper and safe way. You can't just go in there and start smashing away. There are underground tunnels, utilities and god knows what is under there. So they say they are starting demolition. They have. It starts with careful planning. And, thank god for unions.




