News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
(Credit and more photos here)

The University of Waterloo bus terminal is getting its finishing touches, some warmth and wayfinding.

20220103_193636.jpg
20220103_193645.jpg
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know whether the bus platforms at this new bus terminal have a snowmelt system? I'm really hoping they did and we won't end up with ION-esque platforms caked in salt.
 
University Ave needs a serious upgrade. I always thought the public realm between Laurier and Waterloo was incredibly lacking. At least there’s more density now!

They are coming within the decade (phased), approved last year was the University Avenue Gateway Strategy which covers beyond just the universities. Details and concepts can be found here.

No concrete plans, but there seems to be a large focus on public realm activation, which is a spot that I also felt needed a lot of enhancement being this once suburban stroad is now a student downtown lined with many businesses and apartments.

King/University Currently:

1641518476833.png


Concept from the Strategy document:

1641518493222.png
 
Metrolinx has said that signal sighting will be a concern if they use the entire length of the platform over King Street. The west end of the train will be close enough that reading the signals at Kitchener West will be difficult. This is also why they will be closing the level crossing at Duke.

Dan
Can the signals be moved further west?
 
No. There's a spur immediately west of the overpass.

Does the signal have to be before the switch? And the one for the north track can still be moved, no? It seems a bit silly to block off a road and move the platforms further away from the LRT transfer because of a signal.
 
Does the signal have to be before the switch? And the one for the north track can still be moved, no? It seems a bit silly to block off a road and move the platforms further away from the LRT transfer because of a signal.
In this case, yes, the signal needs to be before the switch - it guards it.

There might be the opportunity to move the switch to the Huron Park Spur a little further west if the lands there are owned by CN or GO, and thus are able to be used for a track realignment there. But even then, the most that they would gain is only about 50 feet or so - really not worth the hassle and cost.

Dan
 
Metrolinx has said that signal sighting will be a concern if they use the entire length of the platform over King Street. The west end of the train will be close enough that reading the signals at Kitchener West will be difficult. This is also why they will be closing the level crossing at Duke.

Dan

This doesn't make sense to me - the signal gantry west of King Street is about 20m past the west edge of the bridge structure over King Street, but there are a number of stations along the Kitchener Line alone where the signal gantry is closer or similarly spaced, including west of Malton, east of Etobicoke North, and north of Bloor.
 
This doesn't make sense to me - the signal gantry west of King Street is about 20m past the west edge of the bridge structure over King Street, but there are a number of stations along the Kitchener Line alone where the signal gantry is closer or similarly spaced, including west of Malton, east of Etobicoke North, and north of Bloor.
Those signals are not interlocking signals, and so are allowed to be passed even if the signal is showing red (CROR rule 436 or 437). The one at Kitchener is an interlocking, and thus can only be passed when red under very specific circumstances.

There's also the fact that just because it's done elsewhere doesn't make it ideal. There have been instances where crews accidentally ran through red signals at other platforms (Scarborough immediately comes to mind) just by releasing the brake.

Dan
 

Back
Top