|
|
|
That 5-second makes much difference when the average wait for the next train is measured in minutes!Yes, the 5 second ad. What was confusing here?
The contractual agreement was for 20-years, with payments by TTC. Surely NO hardware is going to last 20 years, and mid-life replacement was always part of this.It's not spin, you just don't like it. 35% retention and falling is not enough to replace an entire wi-fi network that is EOL.
For you perhaps. I certainly use it. And still do!Which made it utterly useless.
Yes.That 5-second makes much difference when the average wait for the next train is measured in minutes!
Again. Show the contract.The contractual agreement was for 20-years, with payments by TTC. Surely NO hardware is going to last 20 years, and mid-life replacement was always part of this.
It's not. It's the beginning of the end. If you were a business and lost 65% of your customers, you'd be out of business.35% is huge ... I really baffled.
Soon you won't.For you perhaps. I certainly use it. And still do!
You (should) well know that the contract is confidential. There was more than enough discussion on this, both on paper, and verbally at the board, that everyone knew it included wi-fi.Again. Show the contract.
If your business model was to support both wi-fi and mobile, but mobile implementation was mostly delayed until 2023/2024, and even then got a 35%/65% split, you'd be fired if you let 35% of your base go - unless you find a way to both reduce the contracted maintenance and increase profit on the 35%.If you were a business and lost 65% of your customers, you'd be out of business.
Yeah what a nutty take.Ok.. you had me up until this point.
This isn't a white privilege thing. What this is, is the reality that 99% of plans have Data even minimally.
Don't turn this into a race issue.
Who s*** in your cornflakes?
The next train estimates are only an estimate.
By the time you connect, find something and download it trains have come and gone.
The only time I ever used Wifi was when I was sitting at a station during delays. I was there for a significant amount of time and would stream my scanner to find out more info.
That it's not true that 99% don't need wifi?Yeah what a nutty take.
So you're making a lot of assumptions then as to what providing a wireless network specifically entailed.You (should) well know that the contract is confidential.
what is this?Saturday September 28, 9am.
Hillcrest shops, 1138 Bathurst st. Toronto.
This is probably the large major streetcar shop around.
Please consider attending.
In November, construction starts to convert this shop to a LRT shop.
The Transfer table will be removed and the pit will be filled in.
$5cdn donation to the United Way as admission.
TTC Open House to support the United Way.what is this?
admission to what?
Uh no ... the board, press department, media, etc. talked endless about wi-fi during the tender process, and when it was awarded.So you're making a lot of assumptions then as to what providing a wireless network specifically entailed.
That doesn't mean it was specified in the contract, nor that it became a responsibility for Rogers to maintain for the rest of time.Uh no ... the board, press department, media, etc. talked endless about wi-fi during the tender process, and when it was awarded.
Rogers assumed 100% of the contract, which was still in effect.That doesn't mean it was specified in the contract, nor that it became a responsibility for Rogers to maintain for the rest of time.
I am certainly not asking permission to think what I want.You can think what you want. But I think the board should be asking staff tough questions about how they weren't consulted by ending wifi.
I'd be worried if you were!I am certainly not asking permission to think what I want.
The Commissioners probably didn't even here about it until today. TTC staff might agree, but I fear they've down an end run past the Commission.Wi-Fi in the stations is at it's EOL, and continuing to support it is not worthwhile. The TTC agree, Rogers agrees, the majority of TTC customers agree.
