policyenthusiast
Senior Member
I'll add that the abutments on the existing bridge show signs of movement. the concrete guard walls at each end of the bridge (over the encased embankment at each end of the bridge, not the arch proper) are out of alignment with each other by over an inch at most joints, with the concrete patches put in to cracks at the base falling out. these walls seem to be falling away from the roadway. I bike on this bridge twice a day to get to work, it's deteriorated noticeably just over the course of this summer. I'm guessing the foundations under the bridge are starting to fail, amongst all the other obvious issues with the concrete above grade.
Content like this is what keeps me coming back to SRC. Thanks for sharing.It actually is. It's been due for replacement since 2014, but the council of the day didn't allocate funding to replace it at the same time they were replacing the 102 Ave bridge over Groat. The city instead installed bracing and scaffolding to hold it up, and these are still in place 11 years later. By the time funding was on the table, the Stoney Plain Road bridge was due for its replacement, which was time sensitive due to the VLW project. The city was able to extend its life until the SPR bridge was finished, but admin told council that its too deteriorated for them to feel safe extending its life for even a few weeks, let alone until the VLW is open. I'm not surprised by that - if the temporary supports failed and the bridge collapsed while people were on it, what professional would want to be the one who allowed that bridge to stay in use? Council should have funded the replacement back in 2014, but we can't do anything about that now sadly.
Here's a picture of some of the scaffolding/supports, taken from admin's Feb. 25, 2025 presentation.
View attachment 680388
See my response above.




