News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
“We firmly believe it is the democratically elected legislature that should be making decisions about how best to get traffic moving,” Sarkaria said on Thursday
Completely ignoring that the democratically elected city council has already made decisions about how to get traffic moving.
 
CONSULTATION ALERT!!! 📯

The City of Toronto has released the dates for the Kingston Road Phase 2 public consultations! A virtual one will be held on Tuesday, October 21 at 7 PM while an in person one will be held on Monday, October 27 (6:00 - 8:30 PM) at R.H. King Academy (3800 St Clair Avenue East). The presentation materials are now up while you can submit your feedback until Monday, November 3.


Some additional detail by way of the information panels:

1760024394037.png


1760024425857.png

1760024474643.png

1760024591534.png



A link to the full set of panels here:


The roll plans are here:


I'm going to put some thought into the above..........

I think the section near Clarence might have a bit more space to pinch.

1760024921544.png


Items to consider: Minor pinch to existing median. Is 1.6M of concrete necessary beside the left hand turn lane when it has no landscaping and is not a pedestrian refuge island? The bulk of the 4.6M median should be retained as it has trees, options for narrowing are limited, however, its edged in concrete, somewhere in/around 0.3/0.4m wide, could that be reduced to 0.1?

As the south side illustrates, a buffer can be created with as little as 0.3M.

Alternatively, the curb lane here is 3.3M. There is a compelling argument for that in general, but in this case, the lane is coming to an end with a forced right, could we pinch it down to 0.3M? Things over which to ponder.

@TwinHuey is duly flagged.
 
I like how at least according to Google Maps there is no such thing as Clissold Street lol, it's Road. But also can they really fit two car lanes in each direction and a protected cycle track under the railway & subway bridges?
Details, details!
 
add50335c34b8b6d907cb8573e6b1da7_Key Map - ATMP.png


Buffered bike lanes to be added in Markham. Construction start date Aug-Dec 2025.

IMG_20251009_213856.jpg


Screenshot_2025-10-09-21-39-40-67_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg


Screenshot_2025-10-09-21-39-55-12_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg


 
View attachment 687049

Buffered bike lanes to be added in Markham. Construction start date Aug-Dec 2025.

View attachment 687051

View attachment 687052

View attachment 687053

If they mean buffered but with no physical separation then most of those bike lanes will 100% be infested with parked cars.
 
Some additional detail by way of the information panels:

View attachment 686936

View attachment 686937
View attachment 686938
View attachment 686939


A link to the full set of panels here:


The roll plans are here:


I'm going to put some thought into the above..........

I think the section near Clarence might have a bit more space to pinch.

View attachment 686940

Items to consider: Minor pinch to existing median. Is 1.6M of concrete necessary beside the left hand turn lane when it has no landscaping and is not a pedestrian refuge island? The bulk of the 4.6M median should be retained as it has trees, options for narrowing are limited, however, its edged in concrete, somewhere in/around 0.3/0.4m wide, could that be reduced to 0.1?

As the south side illustrates, a buffer can be created with as little as 0.3M.

Alternatively, the curb lane here is 3.3M. There is a compelling argument for that in general, but in this case, the lane is coming to an end with a forced right, could we pinch it down to 0.3M? Things over which to ponder.

@TwinHuey is duly flagged.
Paint is not bicycle infrastructure.
 
Paint is not bicycle infrastructure.

If you look at the panels I posted, about 1/2 of the cycle tracks have permanent concrete curbs separating them from traffic, wherever the road is being repaved.

Most of the rest is paint, with flexiposts, because no major roadwork is planned, so this is the temporary version.

There is one section with only paint..............and I'm working on changing that.
 
Last edited:
There is one section with only paint..............and I'm working on changing that.
Nice. Can you elaborate on the compromise the Toronto Star mention this morning? The paper is short on details.

How can you keep bike lanes and return two lanes of traffic? If it's possible, we should have done that in the first place.
 
Nice. Can you elaborate on the compromise the Toronto Star mention this morning? The paper is short on details.

How can you keep bike lanes and return two lanes of traffic? If it's possible, we should have done that in the first place.

This way:

1760100367518.png


You see the concrete median beside the left hand turn lane; that is coming out. That gives you ~ 1.2M to play with.

Noting that I have not seen the roll plan for this segment. I did measure the lane widths, and there is about 1.3M of available room by cutting the lanes to 3.0M wide each That gives you ~2.5M which is pretty close to what you need.

I don't know, but suspect they may also push the north sidewalk back a bit, its public land, and it would be pretty easy to steal another 0.5M if you needed it.

The left turn lane itself can be trimmed by 0.3m as well.

****

On the east side of the underpass, room can be poached from the big yellowed out centre area:

1760100889603.png


The bike lanes don't show in the above image, but I can measure curb to curb, you have ~18M of play, you require 12M to support 4x3M lanes, and 5M, more or less for 2 separated cycle tracks. Its do-able. The space is there.

You can't do the same thing on the downtown sections of Bloor which are much narrower.
 
Last edited:
This way:

View attachment 687088

You see the concrete median beside the left hand turn lane; that is coming out. That gives you ~ 1.2M to play with.

Noting that I have not seen the roll plan for this segment. I did measure the lane widths, and there is about 1.3M of available room by cutting the lanes to 3.0M wide each That gives you ~2.5M which is pretty close to what you need.

I don't know, but suspect they may also push the north sidewalk back a bit, its public land, and it would be pretty easy to steal another 0.5M if you needed it.

The left turn lane itself can be trimmed by 0.3m as well.

****

On the east side of the underpass, room can be poached from the big yellowed out centre area:

View attachment 687089

The bike lanes don't show in the above image, but I can measure curb to curb, you have ~18M of play, you require 12M to support 4x3M lanes, and 5M, more or less for 2 separated cycle tracks. Its do-able. The space is there.

You can't do the same thing on the downtown sections of Bloor which are much narrower.

Okay, I am still not sure what the plan is under the bridges? Will they really be able to fit two car lanes and a cycle track?
 
The City of Toronto just updated their cycling public consultation page and one more project has emerged. Keele from Finch to Steeles.


While there are not any public meetings scheduled, you can fill out a survey until Monday, October 20. Here are a couple of diagrams to show what is being proposed to save @Northern Light some work. ;)

1760116692428.png

1760116703097.png
 
The City of Toronto just updated their cycling public consultation page and one more project has emerged. Keele from Finch to Steeles.


While there are not any public meetings scheduled, you can fill out a survey until Monday, October 20. Here are a couple of diagrams to show what is being proposed to save @Northern Light some work. ;)

View attachment 687133
View attachment 687134

TY for the labour saving.

Did a quick scan. Fine from a cycling perspective, but I don't like the street tree removal on the one side, while we retain a fairly useless median that makes crossing distances longer.

Trim or eliminate the median, add a row of street trees to buffer pedestrians and cyclists from traffic.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top