News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
Also on Harbord Street. Well, sloppy work on these yellow plates. It looks like the workers tried to pull these coverings off in some areas but the asphalt and concrete has (basically) cemented it in place without a hammer and chisel, or something to scrape, to get it off cleanly.

I guess cyclists won't care but that's pretty sloppy work, imo. It would have been incredibly more efficient to remove the film and clean these off before the asphalt and cement hardened.

View attachment 687864

View attachment 687865

View attachment 687866

View attachment 687868

A machine must have drove over this one with asphalt on the treads. Not sure how this will be cleaned off. I don't think rain will even wash that off.

View attachment 687867
I noticed similar results when they paved the Port Union bike lanes a couple weeks ago.
 
I noticed similar results when they paved the Port Union bike lanes a couple weeks ago.
Is Port Union done? May need some updated drone shots from @TwinHuey or something. 😉
 
I wrote to the Mayor about the Esplanade mess where they installed new lines and dividers on a street much in need of repair. I got this response:

"Please see attached response from city staff on your inquiry:

The installation of the quick-build cycle track on The Esplanade was never intended to be bundled with road resurfacing.

The quick-build cycle track was planned to be installed last year but was delayed due to coordination issues.

Road resurfacing on The Esplanade is now projected for 2026 or 2027 (which will be updated on InView) and will provide an opportunity to upgrade the cycle track to permanent materials.


This is the first time I had heard (or realised) that the plan is for a raised track west of Lower Jarvis. It was always clear that the track east of Lower Jarvis would be raised and the raising would occur when the David Crombie Park project (finally) gets off the ground (now set for spring 2026 and the contactor has been selected) but in any documents I have seen it was implied the track between Yonge and Lower Jarvis would NOT be raised. I guess we will see. I pointed out to the Mayor that if City staff had bothered to keep the webpages updated, or even replied promptly yo emails, at least some of the grumbling might have been averted.
 
I pointed out to the Mayor that if City staff had bothered to keep the webpages updated, or even replied promptly yo emails, at least some of the grumbling might have been averted.

I mentioned this very thing to a city official after struggling to find information on the Toronto.ca website and they chuckled when I told them I have been a web designer for 26 years with a heavy emphasis on UX and I felt stupid not being able to find such simple information. I said I should get a job there to fix all this. With a smile in her voice, she said "You should" with a long pause like she wanted to say more. 😅

Anyway, they are horrible for upkeeping the website. Relevant information is not updated promptly. Example: The Cherry House Affordable Housing Lottery that is up on the Toronto website now. It ends on December 1st. Watch how long that information stays on that page past December 1st. Before that, the last lottery was up for at least 4 months past the end date. 🤣 Literally simple scripts can simply have that information vanish from a page on the end date or even setting a note in an email calendar to remove the info would also work.

As a result, I'm never sure if I'm reading any information that is current on any of the city websites (Toronto.ca, CreateTO, etc). 😔
 
Last edited:
I wrote to the Mayor about the Esplanade mess where they installed new lines and dividers on a street much in need of repair. I got this response:

"Please see attached response from city staff on your inquiry:

The installation of the quick-build cycle track on The Esplanade was never intended to be bundled with road resurfacing.

The quick-build cycle track was planned to be installed last year but was delayed due to coordination issues.

Road resurfacing on The Esplanade is now projected for 2026 or 2027 (which will be updated on InView) and will provide an opportunity to upgrade the cycle track to permanent materials.

This is the first time I had heard (or realised) that the plan is for a raised track west of Lower Jarvis. It was always clear that the track east of Lower Jarvis would be raised and the raising would occur when the David Crombie Park project (finally) gets off the ground (now set for spring 2026 and the contactor has been selected) but in any documents I have seen it was implied the track between Yonge and Lower Jarvis would NOT be raised. I guess we will see. I pointed out to the Mayor that if City staff had bothered to keep the webpages updated, or even replied promptly yo emails, at least some of the grumbling might have been averted.
Should CC: to the Ward Councillor as well.
 
Is Port Union done? May need some updated drone shots from @TwinHuey or something. 😉
After reading @APTA-2048's post I drove by this afternoon.

It appears cycle tracks on both sides are now paved but there is still a lot of roadwork ongoing with lane reductions etc.

I'll try to get some aerial shots once it's all finished up.
 
The agenda for next week's General Government Ctte is out.

One item of interest, staff are seeking permission to move ahead with 2 expropriations in service of the Humber Gap Trail.


From the above:

1760622246956.png


**

1760622286285.png

1760622357929.png

1760622410681.png
 
Toronto's Chief Planner, Jason Thorne posted on Bsky recently with a number of updates on downtown cycling infra.

The first we've covered here extensively, but I'll share his photo just the same, Habord:

1760637003631.png


He also covered improvements to the Yonge/Queen's Quay intersection: (protected waiting area, bike box etc.)

1760637080723.png


And work on Wellesley: ( new raised cycle track/platforms at bus stops)

1760637228758.png


Checkout Jason's stuff on Bsky here:

 
He also covered improvements to the Yonge/Queen's Quay intersection: (protected waiting area, bike box etc.)
Very big news as biking this section during tourist season can be a headache between pedestrians and rideshares.

The Harbord enhancements look great. We need more of that all over the city.
 
Meanwhile, on Shuter Street, there are these wishy-washy separators that are supposed to allow for garbage trucks and such to go over them. Problem is, these flaps(?) are rusting and busting all along the cycle lanes. Some are leaning, while others are fully busted and just laying flat now or broken off completely.

I wish they would just commit to something permanent and make it universal. There are too many streets with too many different "types" of bike lane implementations. It comes off very indecisive and reminds of the garbage cans across the city. What version are we on now? 5? 6?. 😑

20251013_112113.jpg


20251013_112125.jpg
 
I mentioned this very thing to a city official after struggling to find information on the Toronto.ca website and they chuckled when I told them I have been a web designer for 26 years with a heavy emphasis on UX and I felt stupid not being able to find such simple information. I said I should get a job there to fix all this. With a smile in her voice, she said "You should" with a long pause like she wanted to say more. 😅

Anyway, they are horrible for upkeeping the website. Relevant information is not updated promptly. Example: The Cherry House Affordable Housing Lottery that is up on the Toronto website now. It ends on December 1st. Watch how long that information stays on that page past December 1st. Before that, the last lottery was up for at least 4 months past the end date. 🤣 Literally simple scripts can simply have that information vanish from a page on the end date or even setting a note in an email calendar to remove the info would also work.

As a result, I'm never sure if I'm reading any information that is current on any of the city websites (Toronto.ca, CreateTO, etc). 😔
Part of the problem with City info is that it needs to be OKed by so many layers of 'communications" staff etc that even simple things do not get fixed for months. In the old days, the engineers were allowed to hold public meetings about plans, now they are chaperoned by communications staff - who seldom know anything but try to stop those who do from sharing it.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top