News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
Given last Sunday's South Scarborough Loop ride hosted by The Driveside and last week's ground breaking for the Brimley Road South trail, I decided to write a blog post explaining what's happening with Scarborough's waterfront.

Would be great to find out if there are any other Scarborough waterfront developments I may have missed. Yes @Northern Light, I'm looking at you. ;)

 
Given last Sunday's South Scarborough Loop ride hosted by The Driveside and last week's ground breaking for the Brimley Road South trail, I decided to write a blog post explaining what's happening with Scarborough's waterfront.

Would be great to find out if there are any other Scarborough waterfront developments I may have missed. Yes @Northern Light, I'm looking at you. ;)

Great write-up! It's quite an ambitious plan, and one I never thought I'd see in my lifetime – and still may not, but here's hopin!

One point on the Bluffs West Project you mention at the end. That gravel trail below Scarborough Heights Park that is cut-off from Bluffers Park by steep cliffs and water, is accessible only via a path / former road with terrible surface conditions and very steep grades. It's dangerous going down and very challenging going up. I love doing it for fun on rides to the east, but it's not for most people. If this were to be part of a more connected trail system, that access road would have to be regraded or made into a switchback to allow for most non-athletes to climb and descend safely. If connections east and west could be extended along the waterfront from the Beaches to Bluffers Park, that might not be needed, but there have to be a few access points along the route.
 
The previous timelines have been nothing but nonsense. They update it and remove the old versions, but it would be fun to use the Internet Archive to go back and trace all the broken promises they've made over the years...

OK, I did a thing as the Millennials say. I have to give some credit to the City for maintaining most of the updates on the Lower Don Trail Improvements site over time, which catalogue a litany of dashed promises and blown deadlines.

It's still instructive to use the Internet Archive to see what was being promised along the way.I screenshot the site, at points of key updates, starting in 2022 around the time they were re-tendering the bid after the initial contractor failed to get it done.

Text follows each image. I cropped them with the date of the capture at the top right. Pardon the length.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.49.33 AM.png


June 25, 2022: A May 2022 updated mentions re-tendering of the contract. Summer 2023 is the stated completion date, even with the re-tendered plan. This was probably never remotely realistic.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.54.27 AM.png

March 20, 2023 - A stealthy change was made nearly a year later, pushing the completion date to Spring 2024. No explanation for this major delay was given. But perhaps the early 2023 date was a typo or holdover from the first contractor's plan. Who knows.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.56.56 AM.png

May 20, 2023 - Another update with a helpful closure map that pushes the completion date to summer 2024. We are now a full year behind the initially given completion date, with no explanation.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.58.42 AM.png


May 27, 2023 - No changes, but a more visible update at the top of the page announcing the trail closure dates and the Summer 2024 reopening date.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 9.00.01 AM.png

June 24, 2023 - The first photos of the work site, and the first reasons given for the slipping schedule.
No date changes here and they are framing the delays as "slight." Just wait.


Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 9.01.26 AM.png


Dec. 5, 2023. A substantial couple of updates with photos and a new delay, with "late summer 2024" being the new goal.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 9.13.11 AM.png

May 14, 2024. The first update of 2024 mentions the soil conditions that necessitated "revised foundation work" for the sloped path, which seems to have been one of the bigger problems. No date changes here.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 9.15.15 AM.png

July 17, 2024 - Another big update and another big delay, pushing completion to July 2025. So another year tacked on.
At this point we were looking at a full two-year delay from the originally announced completion date. Just wait.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 4.20.38 PM.png


Dec. 14, 2024 - Another update with more details on the problems and the work remaining. No date changes, but the "still anticipated" line at the end doesn't sound convincing.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 4.40.54 PM.png

July 17, 2025 - A couple of updates here, with a new timeline and header and a new completion date: November 2025.
So another four months have been added since the last completion date of July 2025 was given and then reaffirmed a few months back.
More blame is being place on Metrolinx here than the soil conditions and narrow worksite that was the culprit in past delays.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 4.42.50 PM.png


Current site (Oct. 27, 2025): I just screenshot some of the recent delay explanations given by the city. The new completion date is now Spring 2026.

For the record, this is approximately 32 months later than the initial completion date of "Summer 2023" that was given back in 2022.

As I said earlier, that 2023 date was never realistic. It was likely an error, or at least wildly optimistic. I'm willing to accept the later change to Spring 2024 that was given when work actually started in May 2023. That still makes Spring 2026 a full 24 month delay – or a 3X increase from the initial 12-month timeline to 36 months. That is very bad.

Also keep in mind I am not even including the time lost to the false-start with the first contractor that was originally supposed to begin in 2021. I feel like that situation was more out of the city's hands, so I am focusing on the re-tendered bid and the current contractor's work.

Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 4.43.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 4.43.29 PM.png

I noticed that Ruthanne Henry, who had been the project manager on the LDT improvements since way back before COVID, is no longer listed on the site. The new senior project manager listed is Rafie Mehraban.

I don't pin this mess on any other individual at City Hall, though some fault must be found in such a terribly executed project. It would be nice to see a postmortem, given this has cost residents one of our key ravine trails for what will be at least 3 years.

Lastly, for those who read this far, the work contract was awarded (after the re-tender) to Grascan Construction Ltd., in Sept. 2022. They made the lowest bid of any company for a total around $10.5 million. The contract was meant to end Aug. 31, 2023. I am unsure whether they are still working off that contract, or have amended it since all the problems and delays arose.

As of now, we wait for the spring.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.44.48 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2025-10-27 at 8.44.48 AM.png
    80.4 KB · Views: 55
Given last Sunday's South Scarborough Loop ride hosted by The Driveside and last week's ground breaking for the Brimley Road South trail, I decided to write a blog post explaining what's happening with Scarborough's waterfront.

Would be great to find out if there are any other Scarborough waterfront developments I may have missed. Yes @Northern Light, I'm looking at you. ;)


I think you've got everything that's actually in process at some level or another.
 
I understand that raised bike lanes are better, but what exactly are wrong with these barriers exactly ? I mean I don't ride bikes much but as a driver I feel better with barriers for the bikers
From a safety perspective, they're not fully secure and are subject to being bumped by vehicles which can obstruct cyclists in the bike lane. This can be especially dangerous at night when a barrier that is jutting into the bike lane isn't easily seen and can cause serious accidents and injuries if a cyclist hits one. And from an urban esthetic perspective, they add nothing to the streetscape. Even when painted they still look like they belong in a temporary construction site.
 
Martin Goodman on Cherry Street.
The short block-long section of the shared Martin Godman on Cherry Street between the Ship Channel Bridge and Unwin Street needs some work. I asked 311, wrote to Paula Fletcher and let the Cycling Unit know. The Cycling folk replied as follows:

"Thank you for your email, and nice to hear from you again! I looked into future plans for this section of trail on Cherry Street, and it appears that upgrades are not included in the near or long-term cycling program.
Contacting 311 and alerting the Councillor’s office is the correct procedure for placing this sort of request, as you have done, so I will also add your comments to our database of cycling requests so we can consider upgrades to the Cherry Street trail in the next round of programming.'

As things tend to happen if there are multiple requests, others might want to chime in?

Here is what it looks like - narrow with bumps!:
Cherry at Unwin.jpg
 
Martin Goodman on Cherry Street.
The short block-long section of the shared Martin Godman on Cherry Street between the Ship Channel Bridge and Unwin Street needs some work. I asked 311, wrote to Paula Fletcher and let the Cycling Unit know. The Cycling folk replied as follows:

"Thank you for your email, and nice to hear from you again! I looked into future plans for this section of trail on Cherry Street, and it appears that upgrades are not included in the near or long-term cycling program.
Contacting 311 and alerting the Councillor’s office is the correct procedure for placing this sort of request, as you have done, so I will also add your comments to our database of cycling requests so we can consider upgrades to the Cherry Street trail in the next round of programming.'

As things tend to happen if there are multiple requests, others might want to chime in?

Here is what it looks like - narrow with bumps!:
View attachment 691846
It's amazing how with Waterfront's massive Port Lands project to the north, with all its new bridges, bike lanes and pedestrian paths, and the upcoming restoration of the MGT trail just to the east of Cherry Beach, no one thought that perhaps a key connector between these two pieces that has fallen into disrepair needed fixing. I get they can't do everything, and priorities have to be made, but this seems like a no-brainer.

The only thing that would be tricky would be changing or improving anything on the actual Bascule bridge. It's basically a heritage piece, and doing anything on it would likely involve Ports and possibly the province or feds who regulate shipping.
 
It's amazing how with Waterfront's massive Port Lands project to the north, with all its new bridges, bike lanes and pedestrian paths, and the upcoming restoration of the MGT trail just to the east of Cherry Beach, no one thought that perhaps a key connector between these two pieces that has fallen into disrepair needed fixing. I get they can't do everything, and priorities have to be made, but this seems like a no-brainer.

The only thing that would be tricky would be changing or improving anything on the actual Bascule bridge. It's basically a heritage piece, and doing anything on it would likely involve Ports and possibly the province or feds who regulate shipping.
The bridge will not change but I agree with you that 'someone' ought to have thought about the link between the Bridge and Unwin - it is only 300-400 meters. I suggest they have two options. Fix the existing shared pathway - widen it a bit and repave - OR just move bike track to the curb lane. Cherry is very wide in this block and I thing there is more than enough road space. Sigh!!
 
As noted above, last week I (and maybe others) told 311 that the Martin Goodman on Cherry between the Ship Channel Bridge and Unwin needed some TLC. I hope they will do LOTS more but someone has now leveled out the worst of the depressions and bumps with fresh asphalt!

I can also report that the contractors who are fixing and resurfacing the Martin Goodman between Cherry Beach and the Unwin Bridge now have a paving machine parked on Regatta Road - presumably ready to start the paving next week.
 
Part of the much maligned bike lane design on Bloor in Etobicoke has started construction on restoring the second EB multi-purpose lane for a 500m stretch. But I wonder how the 2nd lane will still drop approaching Islington without resulting in an awkward merge.

 
Part of the much maligned bike lane design on Bloor in Etobicoke has started construction on restoring the second EB multi-purpose lane for a 500m stretch. But I wonder how the 2nd lane will still drop approaching Islington without resulting in an awkward merge.


Seems like a small win with everything going on. Maybe they don't expect to win the appeal?
 

Back
Top