News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
I guess but the oneway street is the wrong way for typical passenger side unloading.
It seems easier to use the car exit area to the dedicated bus parking zone on the north side of the street. Just not as pretty looking at the front door.
No safe way I guess.

They installed two concave mirrors for the underground parking entrance/exit. Very nice!
View attachment 698724
I wish they would remove the Road Closed signs. It is NOT closed, it has become on-way going west.
 
A couple of Neighbourhood Street Plan public consultations are happening next week! Will include one slide per project to show the active transportation implications.

1. Oakridge Streets Plan - Monday, December 1 (6 - 8 PM) at Oakridge Junior Public School (110 Byng Ave) with survey open until December 15


1764209629437.png


2. Scarborough Village Streets Plan - Thursday, December 4 (6 - 8 PM) at Mason Road Junior Public School (78 Mason Road) with survey open until December 18


1764209707697.png
 
A couple of Neighbourhood Street Plan public consultations are happening next week! Will include one slide per project to show the active transportation implications.

1. Oakridge Streets Plan - Monday, December 1 (6 - 8 PM) at Oakridge Junior Public School (110 Byng Ave) with survey open until December 15


View attachment 699143
There is no existing bikeway on Victoria Park between Denton Avenue and Crescent Town Road.....
 
There is no existing bikeway on Victoria Park between Denton Avenue and Crescent Town Road.....
There is, it’s just not… good. It doesn’t have the painted bike symbols or the signs indicating that it’s a bike lane, so some people might consider it just a shoulder, though the city has installed bike route wayfinding signage along it.

See: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4006507659562656
 

IE26.6 - Cycling Network Plan - 2025 Cycling Infrastructure Fourth Quarter Update​

Consideration Type: ACTIONWards: 1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - York South - Weston, 6 - York Centre, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek, 9 - Davenport, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 18 - Willowdale, 20 - Scarborough Southwest, 23 - Scarborough North, 24 - Scarborough - Guildwood, 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Origin​

(November 20, 2025) Report from the Acting General Manager, Transportation Services

Recommendations​

The General Manager, Transportation Services recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the installation of the following bikeway projects on:

a. Ingleton Boulevard from Alton Towers Circle to Middlefield Road, uni-directional cycle track and multi-use trail;

b. Keele Street from Steeles Avenue West to Finch Avenue West, multi-use trail;

c. Kingston Road from a point 30 metres west of Cliffside Drive to Scarborough Golf Club Road, uni-directional cycle;

d. Kipling Avenue from Panorama Court to Albion Road, multi-use trail;

e. Albion Road from a point 110 metres west of Kipling Avenue to a point 110 metres east of Kipling Avenue, uni-directional cycle track;

f. Panorama Court from Kipling Avenue to a point 35 metres east, uni-directional cycle track;

g. Penlea Avenue from Kipling Avenue to Taysham Crescent, uni-directional cycle track;

h. Breckon Gate from Sheppard Avenue East to a point 50 metres south, bike lanes;

i. Brenyon Way from Sewells Road to Sheppard Avenue East, uni-directional cycle track;

j. Casebridge Court from Morningside Avenue to Venture Drive, uni-directional cycle track;

k. Crow Trail from Tapscott Road to Neilson Road, bike lanes and shared two-way cycling condition;

l. Grand Marshall Drive from Sheppard Avenue East to a point 30 metres south, bike lanes;

m. Venture Drive from Casebridge Court to Water Tower Gate, multi-use trail;

n. Water Tower Gate from Venture Drive to Sheppard Avenue East, multi-use trail;

o. Martin Grove Road from Burnhamthorpe Road to Swan Avenue, shared two-way cycling condition;

p. Martin Grove Road from Rockfield Drive to Boor Street West, shared two-way cycling condition;

q. Acorn Avenue from Montesson Street to Dundas Street West, shared two-way cycling condition;

r. Bloor Street West from Martin Grove Road to Wilmar Road, bi-directional cycle track;

s. Charleston Road from Swan Avenue to Rockfield Drive, shared two-way cycling condition;

t. Montesson Street from Wilmar Road to Acorn Avenue, shared two-way cycling condition;

u. Rockfield Drive from Charleston Road to Martin Grove Road, shared two-way cycling condition;

v. Swan Avenue from Martin Grove Road to Charleston Road, shared two-way cycling condition;

w. Wilmar Road from Bloor Street West to Montesson Street, shared two-way cycling condition;

x. Morningside Avenue from Tams Road to Highway 401 Eastbound Off-Ramp, multi-use trail;

y. Rathburn Road from Melbert Road to The West Mall, bi-directional cycle track;

z. Shoreham Drive from Murray Ross Parkway to a point 96 metres east, uni-directional cycle track;

aa. Murray Ross Parkway from Shoreham Drive to a point 50 metres north, bi-directional cycle track;

ab. Trethewey Drive from Jane Street to Clearview Heights, bi-directional cycle track;

ac. Clearview Heights from Trethewey Drive to Freeman Road, contra-flow bicycle lane and shared two-way cycling condition;

ad. Municipal Drive from Eglinton Avenue West to a point 180 metres north, shared two-way cycling condition;

ae. Weston Road from Finch Avenue West to a point 40 metres south of Lanyard Road, bi-directional cycle track; and

af. Willowdale Avenue from Bishop Avenue to a point 85 metres north, cycle track.

2. City Council authorize the change in bikeway designation on:

a. Davenport Road from Foundry Avenue to Caledonia Park Road, bike lane to uni-directional and bi-directional cycle track; and

b. St. George Street (southbound) from Dupont Street to a point 25 metres south, bike lane to uni-directional cycle track.
 
Of course @DSCToronto beat me to it.

He cheats though; he doesn't read the report first! LOL

Additional info:

1764254279004.png


Of note, for @TwinHuey; the Kingston Road chance is in here, but also, it comes with a new ban on right-on-reds across much of this section of Kingston Rd.

Map:

1764254431514.png



1764254486873.png


Next Map:

1764254535899.png



1764254572067.png
 
Of course @DSCToronto beat me to it.

He cheats though; he doesn't read the report first! LOL

Additional info:

View attachment 699194

Of note, for @TwinHuey; the Kingston Road chance is in here, but also, it comes with a new ban on right-on-reds across much of this section of Kingston Rd.

Map:

View attachment 699195


View attachment 699196

Next Map:

View attachment 699197


View attachment 699198
I blame @DSCToronto too...just as I was trying to map it all out - it was already done!

Well there goes 20 minutes...LOL
 
There is no existing bikeway on Victoria Park between Denton Avenue and Crescent Town Road.....

True, there is no officially designated or signed bikeway, but there is a painted line with a very side space between that and the curb that is used as if it were a bike lane.

It should be officially designated as such and should also receive physical separation as there is ample room to do so.
 
Given Monday's approval of Bill 60 which bans the conversion of traffic lanes to bike lanes or "any other prescribed purpose", my latest blog post looks at the impact of that legislation on Toronto's bike plans, as well as a bunch of projects headed to next Thursday's IEC meeting which were already mentioned here. If there are any projects I'm missing, by all means call them out.

https://www.twowheeledpolitics.ca/2025/11/impact-of-bill-60-on-torontos-bike-plans.html
 
Given Monday's approval of Bill 60 which bans the conversion of traffic lanes to bike lanes or "any other prescribed purpose", my latest blog post looks at the impact of that legislation on Toronto's bike plans, as well as a bunch of projects headed to next Thursday's IEC meeting which were already mentioned here. If there are any projects I'm missing, by all means call them out.

https://www.twowheeledpolitics.ca/2025/11/impact-of-bill-60-on-torontos-bike-plans.html

I read your piece............excellent work as always. A couple of minor notes though.

1) Gerrard work (Sherbourne to Parliament) is tendered, not sure about points east, but still shows in the City work program.

2) Yonge - College to Gerrard also involves removing the median, whether you prioritize the sidewalks or cycle tracks in that block is a potential question, but some space exists that is compliant w/the bill.

3) Downtown Yonge is very far into the future now, regrettably, but when it comes up, I don't think it will be that big an issue, the province will have to approve it, but the business community including the very well connected folks at CF are in favour.

4) Danforth eaat of VP is indefinitely deferred.

5) VP from Dawes to Denton does not involve lane removals, Denton to Danforth does. But there may be an out there, some modelling suggests traffic could flow better here under a re-arrangement of capacity, including turn lanes.

6) Not sure on North York - Yonge

7) Two projects on your list the City would consider asking the province to advance, if the province ever got around to publishing the criteria for approval.

8) Dupont is definitely deferred.

9) St. Clair may be achievable w/o lane reductions.....maybe..... but it would only be a painted bike lane if you do that (1.5M per direction) (There's a centre turning lane that can be removed) Some parking would also have to go.
 
Last edited:
Will the city be allowed to convert on-street parking to transit and bike lanes? If so, wouldn't it be possible to turn the curb lanes into parking for a year and then propose a bike lane that would technically not remove vehicle lanes?
 
Will the city be allowed to convert on-street parking to transit and bike lanes? If so, wouldn't it be possible to turn the curb lanes into parking for a year and then propose a bike lane that would technically not remove vehicle lanes?
I think the part below from Bill 60 prohibits this, and I can't think of places where this would work because many areas with on-street parking are only for certain hours and otherwise used by vehicles as a travel lane, so even if the city had the idea to convert a lane into 24/7 parking, #2 would prevent it.

Prohibition re reduction of lanes
195.3
(1) Except as permitted by the regulations, a municipality shall not, by by-law or otherwise, reduce or permit a reduction in the number of marked lanes available for travel by motor vehicles on a highway or a portion of a highway under the municipality’s jurisdiction and control for any of the following purposes:
1. A bicycle lane.
2. Any other prescribed purpose.


It also modifies the definition of "adjacent infrastructure" in the related part of the HTA:

"The definition of “adjacent infrastructure” in section 195.2 of the Act is amended by striking out “features” and substituting “measures”."

HTA PART XII.1 BICYCLE LANES;
“adjacent infrastructure” includes sidewalks, planters, curbs and traffic calming features; (“infrastructure adjacente”)
 
I think the part below from Bill 60 prohibits this, and I can't think of places where this would work because many areas with on-street parking are only for certain hours and otherwise used by vehicles as a travel lane, so even if the city had the idea to convert a lane into 24/7 parking, #2 would prevent it.

Prohibition re reduction of lanes
195.3
(1) Except as permitted by the regulations, a municipality shall not, by by-law or otherwise, reduce or permit a reduction in the number of marked lanes available for travel by motor vehicles on a highway or a portion of a highway under the municipality’s jurisdiction and control for any of the following purposes:
1. A bicycle lane.
2. Any other prescribed purpose.


It also modifies the definition of "adjacent infrastructure" in the related part of the HTA:

"The definition of “adjacent infrastructure” in section 195.2 of the Act is amended by striking out “features” and substituting “measures”."

HTA PART XII.1 BICYCLE LANES;
“adjacent infrastructure” includes sidewalks, planters, curbs and traffic calming features; (“infrastructure adjacente”)

Prescribed purpose means something that province identifies by way of regulation.

No regulations have yet been published.

TBD.
 

Back
Top