Richard White
Senior Member
He needs an out on record for when there's a Congressional (or Hague) inquest on war crimes. I wonder what the pilots think when ordered to hit wounded men in the water.
Freedom.
Also.. Murrica!
He needs an out on record for when there's a Congressional (or Hague) inquest on war crimes. I wonder what the pilots think when ordered to hit wounded men in the water.
...and the former won't likely happen. Jeffries is pulling the Dems back from the brink of courage again and refusing to hold Hegsbreath to account on this, so /bleah.He needs an out on record for when there's a Congressional (or Hague) inquest on war crimes. I wonder what the pilots think when ordered to hit wounded men in the water.
Some media are now quoting sources that Vice Admiral made the decision. under-bus-tossing has begun.Hegsbreath is now claiming he "wasn't in the room" when the second strike was made on survivors...
I actually don't mind that he's anti-suit...Meanwhile, an observation on FBI Directors' attire over the years...
![]()
derek guy (@dieworkwear.bsky.social)
Never noticed this, but it appears Kash Patel is the first FBI director to deviate from the usual coat-and-tie uniform. Other directors have always worn a suit, even in critical moments, such as Robert Mueller meeting with reporters on 9/11.bsky.app
...I am anti-suit, but I don't go around in FBI paraphernalia as a fashion statement on counter-culture instead. >.<I actually don't mind that he's anti-suit...
Every job has its 'uniform'. He's an appointed department head with, as far as I know, no legislated operational authority. I'm wondering how his 'grunts', who've been-there-done-that feel about him wearing operational gear....I am anti-suit, but I don't go around in FBI paraphernalia as a fashion statement on counter-culture instead. >.<
I actually don't mind that he's anti-suit...
Every job has its 'uniform'. He's an appointed department head with, as far as I know, no legislated operational authority. I'm wondering how his 'grunts', who've been-there-done-that feel about him wearing operational gear.
Then again, we often see governors, etc. wearing tac jackets after a tornado, hurricane, etc.
I think the point of the link was that ever director has worn a suit save Patel, who borrowed a FBI tactical jacket instead for whatever weird reason...Every job has its 'uniform'. He's an appointed department head with, as far as I know, no legislated operational authority. I'm wondering how his 'grunts', who've been-there-done-that feel about him wearing operational gear.
Then again, we often see governors, etc. wearing tac jackets after a tornado, hurricane, etc.
Fair enough.I think the point of the link was that ever director has worn a suit save Patel, who borrowed a FBI tactical jacket instead for whatever weird reason...
I would not be surprised if he is fairly serious. Trump wants to divide and conquer to extract maximum concessions.
Now how serious is he with this?
Worse case scenario, what would happen to Canada?I would not be surprised if he is fairly serious. Trump wants to divide and conquer to extract maximum concessions.




