picard102
Senior Member
It's not up to them. It never was. It's always been up to the US.Up to them what they do with that chance.
It's not up to them. It never was. It's always been up to the US.Up to them what they do with that chance.
I agree with you, for the most part, but it is a difficult situation when the military's boss says or has said or wrote stuff like this:I know there's this idea among the left that military folks are callous bastards who love to kill. But I assure you that nobody in uniform wants a lifetime of PTSD and guilt that will come with knowing they killed a single kid, let alone several. I know quite a few soldiers, including and ex-CO of mine, who suffered tremendously from watching kids killed in Afghanistan. And without exception they all said they wished they had died in place of those kids (none actually killed a kid, just witnessed it). Several attempted suicide after.
We need to fight total war against our enemies when we do. And yeah, you don’t kill civilians on purpose, but you kill bad guys. All of ’em, you stack bodies, and when it’s over, then you let the dust settle and you figure out who’s ahead.
“No stupid rules of engagement, no nation building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars,”
“If we’re going to send our boys to fight – and it should be boys – we need to unleash them to win.”
They need them to be the most ruthless. The most uncompromising. The most overwhelmingly lethal as they can be.
“We are just fighting with one hand behind our back – and the enemy knows it … If our warriors are forced to follow rules arbitrarily and asked to sacrifice more lives so that international tribunals feel better about themselves, aren’t we just better off winning our wars according to our own rules?!”
“What if we treated the enemy the way they treated us?” he asks. “Would that not be an incentive for the other side to reconsider their barbarism? Hey, Al Qaeda: if you surrender, we might spare your life. If you do not, we will rip your arms off and feed them to hogs.”
It is stuff like that, from Secretary Hegseth, that makes people concerned. The man is deranged.:"Our troops will make mistakes, and when they do, they should get the overwhelming benefit of the doubt.”
It is stuff like that, from Secretary Hegseth, that makes people concerned.
I hope many are Americans!I haven't met anybody in uniform that doesn't think this guy is a douche.
I hope many are Americans!
The guy is insufferable.
Surprising a bonehead like that made it that far. Were the other guys even stupider and he got all the promotions?There's a reason he didn't make it past Major in his military career
BBC yesterday was reporting the school is about 600m from the base, so right next door not exactly but certainly close.
There's an entire apparatus of theocratic authorities enmeshed with their security state (IRGC) who are separate from the actual military. Regime change requires killing a lot of these people as a first step.
Not sure where BBC got their 600m from. From all the satellite imagery analysis I've seen, the school building was in a corner of an IRGC compound perimeter:
Again, this in no way excuses the strike. The school was build over 10 years ago, it should have made it on the no strike list long ago.
Rubio has all but admitted to it in this slip-up, when he stipulated that they would never deliberately target a school:
Surprising a bonehead like that made it that far. Were the other guys even stupider and he got all the promotions?
I wonder if they are as technologically averse as hezbollah. Afraid of US/Israel SIGINT to the point that everything is done via in-person meetings even when this could have been an email. Four days into the war and Iran is quickly running out of hardliners...Waiting to see what proportion of that assembly was hit and what the impact will be. I am weary that eliminating the cleric might lead to a more hardline IRGC led state.
Four days into the war and Iran is quickly running out of hardliners...
Not sure. They are still reporting it as of 3 hours agoNot sure where BBC got their 600m from. From all the satellite imagery analysis I've seen, the school building was in a corner of an IRGC compound perimeter:
The Guardian cross-referenced verified videos from the site with satellite imagery to confirm the location of the primary school. Shajareh Tayyebeh school was adjacent to a cluster of buildings that form the local Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) barracks and support buildings. The complex next to the school includes a medical clinic and pharmacy, which has signage bearing the IRGC logo and reads “Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy Medical Command”.
Also in the wider complex is what appears to be a gymnasium or concert space, which is marked “Seyyed al-Shohada Cultural Complex of the Revolutionary Guard”. The school’s location has also been verified by Osint (open source intelligence) researchers, the Iranian student network, and independent Farsi factchecking service Factnameh.




