christiesplits
Senior Member
Is there any indication from the Finch LRT opening day that Crosstown will be slower than projected in the underground sections, i.e. factors other than transit priority signal?
Things like this is Toronto, and the TTC is operating it?Is there any indication from the Finch LRT opening day that Crosstown will be slower than projected in the underground sections, i.e. factors other than transit priority signal?
Like 15 years is not long enough?Makes me wonder if these deficiencies are the reason why speeds are limited on the entirety of the rail.
If thats the case, I would have been fine with waiting a little while longer before launching things.
"very soon after" 2026? As in, 2027?
Premier says Eglinton Crosstown won't open before new year: Premier Doug Ford said there's a possibility that the Eglinton Crosstown LRT could finally open in 2026 or "very soon after."
Because physics doesn't work that way. I already explained this here:I find it amusing that NOW this forum wants to discuss the speed ofcthese LRTs. For years, myself and other posters have been warning you guys that these lines will be slow.
Make no mistake about it. Line 6 is a preview of what to expect on Line 5.
How can the TTC travel trains at a faster pace in the underground portion, while running trains at a slower pace at the at-grade portion and not result in bunching of trains or extended delays at stations?
Especially if there's no TSP, and the at-grade trains are constantly stopped at red lights while underground trains are flying through the tunnels.
No, they just need to maintain a constant rate of speed in relation to other cars on the line.
You can try this out for yourself with another person: start running from point A, then you walk normally onwards from point B. Have a second person follow 30 seconds later, maintaining the same rate of speed. The only way they would catch up with you is if they continued running past point B.
I think he means shortly after the new year. He isn't the best speaker."very soon after" 2026? As in, 2027?It is what the article says, but I wonder if he really said it. Since the article went to the trouble to put quotes around the last 3 words, I'm guessing he did. Either way, I'm sure that's not what he meant.
I'll take the blame for starting it, I cited the Finch experience as a proxy for EglintonHow did an argument on the Finch Line thread spill over to here?
To add to T3G's excellent analogy — for the same reason a slow zone on Line 1/2 doesn't lead to bunching. If everyone slows down to (roughly) the same speeds at the same places, frequency and spacing remains (mostly) constantHow can the TTC travel trains at a faster pace in the underground portion, while running trains at a slower pace at the at-grade portion and not result in bunching of trains or extended delays at stations?
Especially if there's no TSP, and the at-grade trains are constantly stopped at red lights while underground trains are flying through the tunnels.
I’m sure I remember an exhibit at the Science Center that demonstrated this concept.To add to T3G's excellent analogy — for the same reason a slow zone on Line 1/2 doesn't lead to bunching. If everyone slows down to (roughly) the same speeds at the same places, frequency and spacing remains (mostly) constant
But doesn't line 1 & 2 both being completely grade separated factor into this?To add to T3G's excellent analogy — for the same reason a slow zone on Line 1/2 doesn't lead to bunching. If everyone slows down to (roughly) the same speeds at the same places, frequency and spacing remains (mostly) constant




