Dubas
Active Member
Agreed, at least not from this current group. When I've checked in it has made no progress, and leasing for the Parks 1 has been lacklustre at best.
|
|
|
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
Oilers99
Active Member
Lot of people here on this forum cheerlead without actually knowing what is happening on projects or the industry.
David A
Senior Member
And there are also those who become predictable in their negativity. Do you have a better crystal ball than everyone else?
Oilers99
Active Member
Am I being negative by saying a project is not going to proceed? Plenty 'positive' on various other projects. Additionally, don't have a crystal ball but facts that exist.
Last edited:
bodsbods9090
Senior Member
You did say MacLab had put their money elsewhere.
David A
Senior Member
I feel there are some reasons to be more positive that the Parks II makes sense to proceed, but I realize we are mostly debating predictions about the future not facts.
thommyjo
Senior Member
Are there any contingencies with the infrastructure upgrade? If they’ll applied for that, does that require something be built or funds are returned?
IanO
Superstar
Would love to see this:
Become this:
Become this:
MacLac
Senior Member
Perhaps foreshadowing future Westrich project?
Btw, your company's website needs to be updated to reflect your YEG projects....
Btw, your company's website needs to be updated to reflect your YEG projects....
cmd uw
Active Member
What do you mean? Infrastructure associated with supporting the development of Parks II?
IanO
Superstar
Not suggesting us, but simply one of the sites that I hope we see someone develop in my lifetime.
Coming...
IanO
Superstar
Tropical
Active Member
Dare I dream that this fills in 104 Street?
bodsbods9090
Senior Member
Who owns this land anyways?
thommyjo
Senior Member
Isn’t the grant money tied to utility upgrades? Or am I misunderstanding that program?