News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

W

wyliepoon

Guest
Yahoo! News

Link to article

061119boston-skyline.jpg


Piano tower would give Boston a lift

By MARK JEWELL, AP Business Writer Sun Nov 19, 6:18 PM ET

BOSTON - A Boston businessman's proposal to build a 1,000-foot, 75-story glass-and-steel building that would tower over all others is a bold move in a city that favors colonial era church steeples over skyscrapers.
ADVERTISEMENT

Steve Belkin's proposed tower would top the city's current tallest building by more than 200 feet and 15 stories, reflecting a resurgence in the downtown commercial real estate market, observers say.

"I think it's going to make a lot of our other buildings look very boring, quite honestly," said Frank Nelson, a Boston-based executive director with the commercial real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield. "We need it."

The design by renowned Italian architect Renzo Piano emerged last week in response to Mayor Thomas Menino's call in February for private development proposals to replace an aging city-owned parking garage in the heart of the Financial District.

Officials in Boston and other U.S. cities typically seek to rein in developers' wishes to build high above neighboring office buildings, but the sky was the limit for Menino. He encouraged a bold architectural statement to surpass the John Hancock Tower, which for three decades has stood as New England's tallest building at 60 stories and 792 feet.

The Hancock anchors Boston's Back Bay section along with the 42-year-old, 52-story Prudential Tower.

In the nearby Financial District — home to the likes of Fidelity Investments and State Street Corp. — most tall buildings top out at around 40 stories. The last time a new Boston building of more 40 stories went up was in 1987, with the completion of the 46-story One International Place.

In a city that has managed to save historic structures such as King's Chapel and the Old Statehouse from overshadowing high-rises, reluctance to build high runs deep. A state law restricts new buildings that would cast a shadow on Boston Common, and past proposals to build 50 stories or higher in the Financial District have failed to secure city approvals.

"We are an old city that is not that tall, so we take a look at each project and make sure it is appropriate," said Susan Elsbree, a spokeswoman for the Boston Redevelopment Authority, the city agency that will review Belkin's proposal.

So when Menino called for a project taller than any the city had seen before, the mayor and others hoped several developers would respond by last Monday's design-submission deadline, leading to a competitive selection process.

But in the end, there was just the proposal from Belkin, the founder of credit card and travel companies, and part owner of two Atlanta pro sports teams, the Hawks and Thrashers.

However, real estate officials say Menino's failure to bring in more than one development proposal is not an indication that the downtown commercial real estate market has failed to break out of a five-year slump.

They say the office building market is starting to catch up with recent booming residential growth in high-rise downtown condominiums. They cite the Boston office market's vacancy rate of 8.2 percent in this year's third quarter — the lowest in more than four years, according to the commercial real estate firm CB Richard Ellis.

Observers say Belkin was the only developer to come forward because he has an edge over rivals to make the most of the hemmed-in Winthrop Square development site, where the skyscraper would replace the parking garage on Federal Street.

Because Belkin already owns a mid-rise building adjoining the oddly shaped site, he could expand his skyscraper to the space occupied by his existing building, which could be torn down.

"He really had the edge coming in," said David Begelfer, chief executive of the Massachusetts chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties. "The space issue has made it a much more limited opportunity for other developers."

Belkin wants to call his skyscraper Trans National Place, after his company, Trans National Group.

Piano is a Pritzker Prize-winning architect known for his work on such projects as the Centre Pompidou in Paris and The New York Times Co.'s new headquarters in Times Square.

His Boston design would create 1.3 million square feet of office space, with a mix of retail and restaurant space on lower floors. A 1-acre park would be built at ground level, with more public space on the building's roof.

There is no specific timeline for the project, and the city says its review process could involve more than one stage before the final building design is approved. But real estate industry officials say they're optimistic the project will be built, given the recent rebound in the downtown office space market.

Don't expect Boston to resemble Manhattan's skyline. The site for Belkin's tower is one of the last prime pieces of real estate available for development in the downtown core, and new projects on the city's South Boston waterfront are height-restricted to provide unobstructed flight paths to nearby Logan International Airport.

"I think the site for this new building is so prime that it's the last of the great downtown building sites in Boston," said Nelson, of Cushman Wakefield.
 
Good for Boston- it's about time they got a big boy. Along with Philly and Chitown- it'll be nice to see some significant skyscrapers being built in NA again.
 
It's too bad new plans for office buildings in downtown TO don't include a signature type structure at 75-80 stories and well over a 1000ft. BA, RBC and Telus are stumps compared with the stuff proposed in Boston, Chicago, NY, etc.
 
Good for Boston for recognizing an opportunity there by building spectacularly high on one of the few sites left that is appropriate for this. Has anybody been to Boston apres-big dig?
 
Has anybody been to Boston apres-big dig?

I was there last month and will be back next month. It's much nicer without the elevated expressway (still looks like a construction zone though) but the $15 billion price tag doesn't seem worth it. I'd rather invest the money in public transit... think what you could do with that kind of money.
 
$15 Billion would get you the entire DRL from Eglinton/Black Creek through Union to Eglinton and Don Mills, the Scarborough Subway extension, Sheppard from Downsview to Vic Park, York U and maybe some tunnelled LRT on Eglinton and Queen for good measure.

And we'd have enough to demolish the central part of the Gardiner, which unlike the Central Artery, is not a through route.
 
It's too bad new plans for office buildings in downtown TO don't include a signature type structure at 75-80 stories and well over a 1000ft. BA, RBC and Telus are stumps compared with the stuff proposed in Boston, Chicago, NY, etc.
Toronto does have a 1000 ft proposal, and Boston's high rise development is a fraction of what's happening in Toronto. Have some perspective.

I wonder how strong the "Boston isn't world class because the NIMBYs don't allow skyscrapers" sentiment is in that city. Sounds like they protect Boston Common from shadows just like Toronto protects Nathan Philips square.
 
^I've heard the Boston's NIMBYs are some of the most vicious in North America.

The tower looks fantastic. Boston's skyline from the south (as seen in the picture) always looked great, but also like it had the opportunity to be something really visually arresting if only there was a focus.
 
It's a nice tower and compliments the overall skyline well.
 
There isn't much "Boston isn't world class" sentiment in Boston because I don't think many people there have pretensions of being world class. I've spent a lot of time in Beantown (it's one of my favourite cities) and it strikes me as a place that is very, very comfortable--maybe too comfortable--with its current status, which is as the staid, old-fashioned, un-funky little sister to New York. It's a very civilised, conservative place, which is why big 'world class' gestures like this tower don't come along very often there.
 
With big name universities like Harvard and MIT around, Boston doesn't really need anything else to show that they're world class.
 
Indeed Boston is an academic world think-tank. Probably the most prominent in the Western world. They set the standards. Funny how their doentown tunnel isn't being reciprocated elsewhere.
 
...and I can't think of too many other places in N. America (New Orleans, Quebec City, Charleston perhaps) where history and heritage are so front and centre, so dominant a part of the collective identity.
 
I love Boston... it's my number 2 US city after NYC. So much charm, character and civility.
 

Back
Top