If anything, it may be through his "victory even in defeat" in 2003--that is, he overachieved relative to early expectations and relative to a perceived anti-Mel backlash. And that he actually *did* come through as a good candidate--in one-on-ones with Miller, they came across as thoughtful, collegial equals, one left-of-centre, one right-of-centre. When it came to frontrunner quality and tone of debate, it was the one post-Megacity election that was truly worthy of a cosmopolitan 2 1/2-million metropolis.
It's everything *since* then that's been a disaster. But the 2003 campaign was when John Tory shone brightest--and it's with that recall that Tory's been leaned upon again. (Of course, Tory 2014 might just as well wind up relative to Tory 2003 as Barbara Hall 2003 was to Barbara Hall 2007. That's why I say: watch Soknacki.)