kEiThZ
Superstar
I am not, I am thinking logically.
Do you really think NATO would start World War 3 over Hungary?
Again. That is how Article 5 works. An attack on one is an attack on all. This is not a soft promise. If it was, there would be no point to NATO. Your argument could also be used on the Baltic countries or aspirants like Sweden. Would we really fight WW3 over Estonia or Finland?
Also, in your hypothetical, Russia attacks a NATO member state but it is NATO starting WW3? How's that work?
Again, Orban says a lot. He's doing his best to undermine NATO and the EU from the inside. Personally wish those organizations would boot Hungary. But my wishes aside, you need to understand where this argument and questioning of NATO's resolve comes from. And ask yourself why the Finns and Swedes want to sign up, if NATO really is as uncommitted to defending smaller countries as Orban suggests.
Last edited: