[zang]

I'm still with Matlow. Chow is my nightmare candidate, even more so than Saunders, there is literally nothing there with her. No substance. Never been in power, never managed multi-billion dollar budgets, never negoitiated with unions,

What?!

Why is that a criteria for Chow but not Matlow?

I like Matlow, but objectively and unequivocally, Olivia has vastly more experience in politics than Josh. She's held greater power in a federal parliament seat than he ever has. Neither has managed budgets of that size, and both have two terms as TDSB Trustees, where union negotiation is part of the job.

And secondly, if managing multi-billion dollar budgets is a required criteria, outside of the business world (and even then, not that many) you'd be lucky to find a few dozen active politicians in Ontario with that on their resume. Toronto's budget is bigger than more than half of the other provinces.

out of city hall for years. I would like to know who set her up.

And there's the conspiracy. She has no agency of her own?

Tory's endorsement 5 days to the election infuriated me, he had to wait til 129k Torontonians voted before he spoke up - what the hell sort of dick move is that? Why not endorse her straight away? If Chow wins I look forward to the end of homelessness in Toronto - LOL!

Arguably, Chow will do more to help the homeless than Tory's dick move of sending cops into parks. At least she has compassion.

Chow and Matlow's plans to address homelessness aren't actually all that different.

Press Release: Chow announces more support for people who need it most

Olivia Chow will strengthen the City’s approach to lifting people out of homelessness and keeping people housed.

www.oliviachow.ca

Josh Matlow sets new direction for housing in Toronto

Mayoral candidate’s $407.6 million plan will create livable neighbourhoods making it easier for people to find an affordable place to live, for communities to build vibrant neighbourhoods and for the city's homeless to find meaningful support.

www.votematlow.ca

I'll note, I say this as the uncle of someone who spent almost a year and half living in homeless camp—in a park—getting herself clean off meth. Sometimes homelessness is the safest option for someone in a dangerous situation. It's not a "lifestyle" that most people actively choose. It is not a scourge, it's a symptom of rot in the system and lack of compassion for other human beings. Those without homes are not a pawn for political one-upsmanship, so please don't treat them like an albatross to be hung around Chow's neck if she wins.

 

[zang]

That's Chow's whole strategy. Lay low, say nothing, seize power.

You say "seize" like it's a coup.

This is the voice of the public; in what's arguably likely to be the biggest mayoral election turnout in a very long time.

She's said plenty, or the other candidates would have had a much easier job.

 

[picard102]

She's held greater power in a federal parliament seat than he ever has.

She was in opposition.

And secondly, if managing multi-billion dollar budgets is a required criteria, outside of the business world (and even then, not that many) you'd be lucky to find a few dozen active politicians in Ontario with that on their resume. Toronto's budget is bigger than more than half of the other provinces.

I agree with this, as a multi-millionaire herself she's well acquainted with dealing in large sums of money.

 

[John_Dee]

I just did my civic duty, though I had to trudge through the rain for it. Perfectly dismal weather for a perfectly dismal election. One person was there voting as I arrived, and one other showed herself as I was leaving so it was hardly swamped with people.

 

[picard102]

Yeah we turned around and went back home.Will try and go latter when the rain eases up.

 

[zang]

She was in opposition.

She held a federal seat. There's still power in that. Or is politics only relevant if you're at the top of the pyramid?

I agree with this, as a multi-millionaire herself she's well acquainted with dealing in large sums of money.

Got proof of that?

 

[picard102]

She held a federal seat. There's still power in that. Or is politics only relevant if you're at the top of the pyramid?

I think sitting in opposition is less relevant than sitting on council.

Got proof of that?

So you don't think she's experienced with large budgets now?

 

[Admiral Beez]

You clearly live in Anglophone North America but most of us live (or try to live)in North America.

Easy there, it's a rare sensible sentence that begins with an accusation. My 25+ year career is in international sales and I take pride in including accents in all my communications. My keyboard is hotkeyed for those I use most. It's an essential part of my daily life in both business and in trying to be welcoming to those I meet. In North America you may find someone like us who will strive to always use your accents, but in most cases those with accents in their names will have to either accept or insist against their accent's omission. That's my point above.

I consider comments about names with accents rather ill-informed. He appears not to even try to use accents

Again, suppositions where inquiry is your better friend. Ask me if I use accents, and I will tell you I always strive to. My point is that in North America, it's a struggle for those that use them.

Now back on topic.... I never thought about electing a dog.

Why 101 people and a dog want to be Toronto's mayor

North America's fourth-largest city has a historic number of candidates in its upcoming by-election.

www.bbc.com

 

[nfitz]

Odd - noon on election day, and I just got a (typical) polling call for the election; though they asked for my second choice, which I haven't had before in this election. From "Northwest Research Group", whoever they are. As usual, Bailão was mispronounced.

Seems kind of pointless, unless they show up to drive me to the polls, depending on who I choose.

As usual, call was on the landline - I've had none on my mobiles this election.

Sure, that’s why it’s called anglophone North America. If you want to use foreign characters for monikers that’s your business, but don’t except the society to universally accept, understand or value them.

I've literally never heard it called anglophone North America, outside the odd, very academic, paper, or the white nationalist movement.

Foreign characters? We should ask the First Nations about foreign characters. Aren't we all foreign characters?

 

[zang]

So you don't think she's experienced with large budgets now?

That's some serious trolling going on there.

So, got anything to back up the multi-millionaire claim, or are you just gonna keep up with this trolling BS?

 

[picard102]

That's some serious trolling going on there.

So, got anything to back up the multi-millionaire claim, or are you just gonna keep up with this trolling BS?

Not everything you don't want to hear or agree with is trolling.

LMGTFY - Let Me Google That For You

For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.

bfy.tw

 

[zang]

Not everything you don't want to hear or agree with is trolling.

No, but intentionally ignoring a request for proof of a specious claim one's made while trying to turn it around certainly qualifies.

LMGTFY - Let Me Google That For You

For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.

bfy.tw

Yeah, see... You made the claim. Don't be lazy. Back it up with some kinda proof. Or were you just pulling it out of nowhere?

 

[Admiral Beez]

I've literally never heard it called anglophone North America....

Me neither, in truth, before I saw it above. We are all indeed foreign characters

 

[Northern Light]

No, but intentionally ignoring a request for proof of a specious claim one's made while trying to turn it around certainly qualifies.


Yeah, see... You made the claim. Don't be lazy. Back it up with some kinda proof. Or were you just pulling it out of nowhere?

Relax.

He's correct.

She owns her home, that alone is sufficient to make the claim true.

Suffice to say, she also has investments and on going income.

Calling someone a multi-millionaire is not a slag on them, wasn't used pejoratively here. It was used her defense in point of fact, to suggest she knew how to manage money.

She is worth several million, that's fine. Next.

 

[picard102]

No, but intentionally ignoring a request for proof of a specious claim one's made while trying to turn it around certainly qualifies.

Yeah, see... You made the claim. Don't be lazy. Back it up with some kinda proof. Or were you just pulling it out of nowhere?

I just gave you a link to look it up yourself, but I'm lazy?