lenaitch
Senior Member
I saw this on another forum. Just throwing it on the table:
|
|
|
I saw this on another forum. Just throwing it on the table:
Doug Ford is already in a sense effectively the mayor of Toronto, it doesnt hold water.I saw this on another forum. Just throwing it on the table:
Less tickets......LOL.What's the benefit of eliminating speed cameras?
40 percent above the limit shouldn't be a ticket? I'd like to see the traffic engineers or those who suggested the speeds comment.Doing 42 kmh in a 30 zone shouldnt be a ticket. Its a total money grab.
Going 40 in a residential zone is slow enough. Of course its a money grab.40 percent above the limit shouldn't be a ticket? I'd like to see the traffic engineers or those who suggested the speeds comment.
The following is bot meant to be snarky but genuine curiosity... I always see comment about traffic (speeding) infractions as 'money grabs' but don't see any evidence to support. Could it be a lack of understand why speeds are set particular ways?
To keep on topic, are there any candidates that don't agree with the cameras?
Why don't you just.... not speed.Going 40 in a residential zone is slow enough. Of course its a money grab.
The City makes tens of millions of dollars on speed cams annually.
As I said before in another thread, install speed bumps in school zones or high pedestrian accident streets.
I have no problem with speed bumps. Thats what they do in Oakville.
I dont know yet which candidate is against speed cameras (if any), but I'm going to send some emails and find out
What is the point of having traffic laws, then, if any driver can just decide that something shouldn't be a ticket?Less tickets......LOL.
I've gotten 2 of these things already, and they were for going 11 and 12 clicks over the limit respectively.
Doing 42 kmh in a 30 zone shouldnt be a ticket. Its a total money grab.
Thats why I always called John Tory "Greedface" because thats what he is.
Going 40 in a residential zone is slow enough.
The City makes tens of millions of dollars on speed cams annually.
Its not that simple.What is the point of having traffic laws, then, if any driver can just decide that something shouldn't be a ticket?
Here's a thought: have you tried driving at the speed limit? It's real simple, and you get to hold on to your cash. Win win.
That was during the pandemic. A lot less cars on the road.There is a compelling argument that it is not slow enough.
View attachment 456012
From: https://roadsafety.transport.nsw.gov.au/stayingsafe/pedestrians/speedandfatalities/index.html
This is not accurate.
The City collect a total of 34M (gross) in revenue from the program's inception in July '20 to Oct '22.
That would equal 14.57M gross per annum.
However, that's before deducting program cost:
Cameras: 2.5M per annum + charge backs from Transportation, and Legal.
At most, they are netting under 12M per year, on a 16B annual budget.
From: https://globalnews.ca/news/9321380/toronto-speed-camera-program-revenue/
Even though it leads to over 3 times the deaths?I just think going 41 in a 30 zone shouldnt be a ticket.