News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.8K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5K     0 

Who gets your vote for Mayor of Toronto?

  • Ana Bailao

    Votes: 18 16.4%
  • Brad Bradford

    Votes: 3 2.7%
  • Olivia Chow

    Votes: 58 52.7%
  • Mitzie Hunter

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Josh Matlow

    Votes: 20 18.2%
  • Mark Saunders

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 4.5%

  • Total voters
    110
  • Poll closed .
The taxes are also being kept low for seniors who are on average the wealthiest generation that have paid for homes and can most afford the property tax hikes...
Unless you force seniors to sell their homes, how is the average senior supposed to pay higher property taxes? This is not an uncommon approach cities take where property tax increases are used to clear out senior homeowners. Meanwhile, with no need for schools, little utilities and much reduced road use, the average homeowning senior is costing the city very little at all, beyond your resentment of course.
 
Last edited:
^ transit city was brilliant. Too bad that the following administration was stupid enough to scrap it.
I blame Miller. He bailed before enacting his plan, leaving us to Ford. Miller would have won again, and could have put Transit City irrevocably into play before retiring to this lofting roles elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rbt
Unless you force seniors to sell their homes, how is the average senior supposed to pay higher property taxes? This is not an uncommon approach cities take where property tax increases are used clear out senior homeowners. Meanwhile, with no need for schools, little utilities and much reduced road use, the average homeowning senior is costing the city very little at all, beyond your resentment of course.

There is already a program for seniors to defer a portion of their property tax if they find it financial burden, and the City collects the money on sale of the property.

 
I blame Miller. He bailed before enacting his plan, leaving us to Ford. Miller would have won again, and could have put Transit City irrevocably into play before retiring to this lofting roles elsewhere.

He became profoundly unpopular during the garbage strike in which he was seen to be caving to the Unions and not in a rush to address the issue. That was likely unfair, but not helped by the terrible optics of Miller nearly in tears when there was some picket line violence at a transfer station.

He likely could have recovered; but between the political damage and the amount of abuse he and his staff were taking from the public, he chose to exit.

Perhaps the wrong call; perhaps a strategic error in terms of how he handled the negotiation/strike; but understandable, I think.
 
He likely could have recovered; but between the political damage and the amount of abuse he and his staff were taking from the public, he chose to exit.
Incumbent mayors losing their reelection attempt is a very rare thing in Toronto. Sewell was beaten by Eggleton. That's the only one I can recall.
 
At this point it is absolutely Chow’s race to lose. I’m very certain that she’s being coached to stay on message and avoid landmines.

Chow’s election pitch — the overarching message of inclusiveness, combined with the careful grandmotherly approach — are working, in the wake of two aberrations (Rob Ford’s belligerent “screw ‘em, then Tory’s “we really are dullards after all”).

Chow should call on a large cross section of individuals to lead the city if she wins.
 
He became profoundly unpopular during the garbage strike in which he was seen to be caving to the Unions and not in a rush to address the issue. That was likely unfair, but not helped by the terrible optics of Miller nearly in tears when there was some picket line violence at a transfer station.

He likely could have recovered; but between the political damage and the amount of abuse he and his staff were taking from the public, he chose to exit.

Perhaps the wrong call; perhaps a strategic error in terms of how he handled the negotiation/strike; but understandable, I think.
Agreed. I found that he was a brilliant person who unfortunately lost his nerve. I’d heard rumours that he’d had a belly full of the right wingers. Also, it was suggested by some that he new a right wing wave was coming. I considered this tragic.

He did make errors, I’ll give you that. On balance he was good!
 
I am honestly not sure who gets my support at this point, but I know who won't get it. Saunders let a serial killer hunt down the gay community and Furey is kind of anti-immigrant, so count them out.
 
Incumbent mayors losing their reelection attempt is a very rare thing in Toronto. Sewell was beaten by Eggleton. That's the only one I can recall.
Rowlands was beaten by Hall in '14. (And in the outer municipalities, both Holyday & Nunziata defeated incumbents that year.)
 
Unless you force seniors to sell their homes, how is the average senior supposed to pay higher property taxes? This is not an uncommon approach cities take where property tax increases are used to clear out senior homeowners. Meanwhile, with no need for schools, little utilities and much reduced road use, the average homeowning senior is costing the city very little at all, beyond your resentment of course.
Seniors should pay what everyone else is paying. My point is that we shouldn’t avoid increasing property taxes to protect seniors. If a senior can’t pay then they should do what everyone else would - sell and move somewhere more affordable for their income.
We could also do what Vancouver does and that is to defer property tax until the properly sells. The city would put an IOU onto the property. The city needs more money for better services that seniors can rely on like better snow clearing, transit etc…
 
Seniors should pay what everyone else is paying. My point is that we shouldn’t avoid increasing property taxes to protect seniors. If a senior can’t pay then they should do what everyone else would - sell and move somewhere more affordable for their income.
We could also do what Vancouver does and that is to defer property tax until the properly sells. The city would put an IOU onto the property. The city needs more money for better services that seniors can rely on like better snow clearing, transit etc…
Property taxes should be a percentage of services used, not on value. Instead we should have VAT charged on all primary residence transactions.
 
Property taxes should be a percentage of services used, not on value. Instead we should have VAT charged on all primary residence transactions.
How would you ever have a property tax on services used? Property tax can only ever be on the value of the land and its usage.

I’m all for VAT but that is HST essentially and the city doesn’t have access to such revenue. If Toronto could get 2% of HST and raising it to 15% , where it was in early 2000s then city could use that to cover some of the budget hole.
 
Property taxes should be a percentage of services used, not on value. Instead we should have VAT charged on all primary residence transactions.
Land value tax should be used to fund services. It is demonstrated to incentivize investment and not harm affordability.
 

Back
Top