I am well known as being among the most open-minded here and willing to entertain arguments and people with whom I disagree.
But the arguments must be made in good faith, by people of good faith, they must be germane to the topic of the thread and demonstrate some intelligible thought process.
That is not the case here. There is a cycling infrastructure thread here where you can post your widely discredited views that have been shown by evidence the world over to make no sense, those arguments have been had here before
and they were resoundingly exposed as ill-conceived before.
***
Your other arguments on other subjects are no less absurd, they are clearly designed to engage people in a flame war, and to degenerate a place of thoughtful discussion into the morass that is SkyscraperPage.
I'll pass thanks.
This is inaccurate, you were baiting other members with comments you know to be infuriating and intellectually unsound.
Also, as Furey cannot be described as a credible contender at this juncture, I don't think his fringe views merit further examination.
