News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

If an election was held today, who would you vote for?

  • UCP

    Votes: 8 13.3%
  • NDP

    Votes: 44 73.3%
  • Liberal

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alberta Party

    Votes: 4 6.7%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 6.7%

  • Total voters
    60
Nothing screams competence like typos in your attack ads on Nenshi.

IMG_8042.jpeg
 

Can we get our Alberta health care number on our licenses first please!
The reason it’s not is privacy related. Alberta health cards don’t have pictures, but in Ontario or other province with pictures, you can’t use your health card as ID due to health information privacy laws.
 
The Province revealed its border security platform today. Curious how they are going to arrest people for trying to smuggle shit into the US if they are still in Canada and haven't yet tried to smuggle shit into the US. Seems to me the money would be better spent trying to intercept illegal drugs and people coming into the country in the first place. Good to see them at least working with their Canadian and American counterparts on this.
 
The Province revealed its border security platform today. Curious how they are going to arrest people for trying to smuggle shit into the US if they are still in Canada and haven't yet tried to smuggle shit into the US. Seems to me the money would be better spent trying to intercept illegal drugs and people coming into the country in the first place. Good to see them at least working with their Canadian and American counterparts on this.
It says that the Province is basically declaring the border to be critical infrastructure and will mandate officials to intercept people within 3km of the border without needing a warrant. That alone will be a powerful deterrent. It also likely violates the Constitution, but in an era where climate change and indigenous activists can block rail lines with impunity, arsonist can torch churches and pro Hamas troublemakers can riot and shoot up schools, the Feds have more or less abdicated law and order. In the words of Gerry Butt's, Danielle Smith's actions are "understandable."
 
in an era where climate change and indigenous activists can block rail lines with impunity, arsonist can torch churches and pro Hamas troublemakers can riot and shoot up schools, the Feds have more or less abdicated law and order. In the words of Gerry Butt's, Danielle Smith's actions are "understandable."
Ignoring some of your liberties with the truth... Last time they "brought in the tanks" against things like that it didn't go so well.
 
Ignoring some of your liberties with the truth... Last time they "brought in the tanks" against things like that it didn't go so well.
Please dispute any of my statements with facts and nowhere have I mentioned "calling in the tanks"
 
I doubt it will do anything other than allow Sheriffs to harass people. Getting arrested by the Americans should be far more of a deterrent than an unconstitutional stop would.

If the antivaxxer protest happened today, would the UCP protect this critical infrastructure?
I agree it will likely be all show.

The UCP tried to use the Critical Infrastruce Defence Act against the nominally antivax "protestors" that attempted to blockade Coutts. They also declared hospitals to be critical infrastructure to insulate them for antivax "protestors". I don't think anyone has been successfully charged, but if it ups the stakes to discourage some, it might be worth it.
 
Please dispute any of my statements with facts and nowhere have I mentioned "calling in the tanks"
Climate change and indigenous activists can block rail lines with impunity
-Completely legal and within their rights as protestors

Arsonist can torch churches
-Under investigation by law enforcement

Pro Hamas troublemakers can riot and shoot up schools
-Under investigation by law enforcement

Sure you didn't say call in the tanks but I'm not sure what law and order response you're looking for?
 
I agree it will likely be all show.
From this recent article there's been ~21,000 illegal crossings from Canada to US this year. Unsurprisingly, 18,000 of these are from eastern Ontario and southern Quebec - it's not some conspiracy or different rules/enforcement going on - it's just easy to cross there with many roads, towns and access points in the east. As often reported, all of this is a minor fraction of total immigration to the US: https://www.cbc.ca/news/border-trump-crossings-1.7395268#:~:text=Overall illegal border crossings from,U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

But as you said, all this is for show - illegal immigration from Canada isn't a "real" issue for the US in a practical sense. It's an issue only in the sense that everything is an issue when it's an extension of culture war principles to always be angry and feel threatened. The real objectives of changing US policy aren't really about this though - the real objectives are the total policy change in the US that is looking to end the free trade era and adopt this new onshoring, tariff-based philosophy.

I think Alberta - as the poster-child of the all too common myopic provincial attitudes in Canada - is poorly positioned to address what's actually going on here. Decades of over-reliance and political capture by a single trade-dependent industry combined with a political ideology to blame others and make "everything Ottawa's fault", has created a stale and ineffective political class unwilling to materially adapt to changing situations. None of this is new of course - over-reliance on a single industry is a common Alberta talking point since the province was created. We just haven't dealt with our fickle trading partner actually acting so dramatically and so quickly against our interests for many decades.

Responding to the border stuff is just responding to the rhetoric, the real issue is Trump's on-shoring of everything is his goal, he also doesn't seem to concerned about the costs to US consumers by raising taxes on them through the tariff approach. Frack, baby, frack is the issue, not a few dozen people who trudge through southern Alberta annually. So far what we have seen is the province waste time and money throwing a few bucks at the imaginary "problem" of border issues outside it's jurisdiction.

What the province should be focusing on when there's an external threat is strengthening ties to Canada - draft a bunch of uni-lateral internal trade agreements with all other provinces to to harmonize working permits and licenses so anyone can work anywhere easier. Remove barriers to all industries that help with diversification (e.g. cancel the anti-wind and solar legislation etc.) Stabilize provincial systems through more predictable funding and taxation schemes that don't rely on royalties.

Essentially do the stuff everyone has been saying to do for a half-century that is within provincial jurisdiction and stop wasting so much time pretending to be a different level of government and responding to the culture way stuff of the day.
 
Last edited:
The UCP gov't is going to waste a lot of money on moronic and hateful stuff. I prefer when they spend their energy on moronic stuff over the hateful [and moronic] stuff, so I guess this is a win?
 
Doug Ford is a capitalist first, a crony second, and Canadian third. Trump is threatening the capital/money of the province which he runs, sp he'll stand up for it. I hate the c*nt, but I'm impressed by the posture he's taking.
 

Back
Top