Prometheus The Supremo
►Member №41+⅜◄
If you're going to make claims, back it up with proof.
(or else it would be intellectually dishonest and lazy)
heed your own advice. please.
If you're going to make claims, back it up with proof.
(or else it would be intellectually dishonest and lazy)
heed your own advice. please.
How does the Big Bang prove the existence of god? How do you arrive at this conclusion?
As for unexplained forces, why not just call them unexplained forces? If they are "unexplained" then they can't be god. That "unexplained" status suggests nothing in particular, so why pretend to have knowledge of what fills that unexplained space? These forces are, by your own admission, unexplained.
As for this "higher power," it is just a gift wrapping to cover up a lack of knowledge. What is the nature of this power? What do you mean by "higher" power? How high? Where? None of this is remotely measurable or accessible. You want to call it god, others might want to call it pixie dust.
The part that's been quoted.
Willful ignorance.
Originally Posted by urbanboom as a response to digi:
If you're going to make claims, back it up with proof.
(or else it would be intellectually dishonest and lazy)
heed your own advice. please.
In what respects? You give me advice, but no context. Tell me where I was intellectually dishonest and lazy. Until then it's just a "claim", remember?
There is only one explanation to why something matter appeared where there was no matter before: there is a higher power.
If you can give me a better explanation as to why matter appeared out of nowhere, or why the laws of physics are in place, I would love to hear it.
A theory is not science. Science is not a theory.
Those are two different things that you are confusing I think.
Science is factual. It does not lie. Science can prove things. However we are limited with what we have, so science can not prove or disprove how everything started. Therefore someone made a theory of how they think it all started and called it Big Bang. Big Bang is not science, just someone's theory. It just so happens to be a widely believed theory, based on scientific knowledge.
No, I am not being "willfully ignorant", I've made points and cited my proof, and you have yet to answer a question.
I was just looking at the Big Bang Theory in a Religious point of view. Many claim the science disproves God because it "has all the answers". My point is that it doesn't have all the answers! It explains much of the "what", but not the "how". From what we know in scientific knowledge, God cannot be disproved. Of couse, this may one day change, but for today, it cannot.
Just my opinion, but this is an endless debate. Those that believe in God do not need to prove it, nor do they need to back up their belief, as it's called Faith. Those that choose not to believe in God do so freely as well. Surely, as Rodney King said, we can all get along.
Just my opinion, but this is an endless debate. Those that believe in God do not need to prove it, nor do they need to back up their belief, as it's called Faith. Those that choose not to believe in God do so freely as well. Surely, as Rodney King said, we can all get along.
What about those who think it's stupid to pretend we know either way?
There's no need to prove belief, but in debates like this that's exactly what happens. Nothing wrong with that, this has been an interesting thread. The key difference between the two positions is that when something has no evidence, let alone proof, non-belief is the logical position to take. The burden of proof is on the believer.Just my opinion, but this is an endless debate. Those that believe in God do not need to prove it, nor do they need to back up their belief, as it's called Faith. Those that choose not to believe in God do so freely as well. Surely, as Rodney King said, we can all get along.
No, but there is no scientific evidence disproving my theory. As of now, the possibilities are endless. Until Science says otherwise, I am neither wrong, nor right. Just as you are neither wrong nor right in saying that my theory is wrong...