News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

I'm glad I was born a Gen Xer, born 1971. Benefited from OSAP grants before they were canceled and replaced by pricey loans. Had no problem landing a job when I graduated university in 1995 in my chosen field (international sales). Houses weren't too pricey, in 1998 our semi in Cabbagetown was under $300K, or about 4X our family pre-tax income of the time.

I can't imagine trying to buy a CT house today, assuming two good jobs paying $70K or thereabouts, a house even like my old semi (no parking, no insulation, etc...) would be >7X ones' family pre-tax income. Maybe that's where the bubble will begin, but I don't see my house dropping to anything near its pre-2000 value. As for my kids, they'll be fine, though I wish I'd bought them both a condo as rental years ago.

Cabbagetown houses took off. There was a time they were attainable, still pricey for me but attainable. Now? For the type of house I want? Not a chance...and that's with 2 high paying incomes. I'm not one of those people who feels I'm owed a house, but $800K budget doesn't get you very far.
 
Cabbagetown houses took off. There was a time they were attainable, still pricey for me but attainable. Now? For the type of house I want? Not a chance...and that's with 2 high paying incomes. I'm not one of those people who feels I'm owed a house, but $800K budget doesn't get you very far.
If I was a young person I'd be leaving this city, and I mean the entire GTA. When I moved to Fredericton, NB in 2004 I was amazed at how cheap houses were. Even today, right downtown on the walking trails and walkable to cafes and shops is this for under $320K https://www.realtor.ca/Residential/...AINT-JOHN-ST-FREDERICTON-New-Brunswick-E3B4B3

No, rural or small town life isn't for everyone (I came back to Cabbagetown after 3 years in Freddie, for example), but I think too many millennials envision the only life is working for a start-up software firm and living in a condo box. There's a lot of country out there.
 
I lived in a small town for a lot of years. My children left because there simply weren't career opportunities. There were jobs, but not careers.
 
No, rural or small town life isn't for everyone (I came back to Cabbagetown after 3 years in Freddie, for example), but I think too many millennials envision the only life is working for a start-up software firm and living in a condo box. There's a lot of country out there.

This is playing out all over N. America. If you compare it to Gen X, a key difference is Gen X couldn't wait to get their license and be 'free'. However, Millennials having grown-up in a virtual world do not want to go out and 'live'. They are generally content with being in that shoe box as long as they have their internet connection (i.e. through laptop, tablet, phone, tv). The work is an extension of the house they grew up on in, so workplace needs to be as convenient to get to as their kitchen. Also explains why many don't even have their licenses or desire that first car anymore. Whereas pre-internet generation, you got antsy being at home. Also less coddled by the parents who expected you to get out.

I lived in a small town for a lot of years. My children left because there simply weren't career opportunities. There were jobs, but not careers.

This is the very reason why many don't want to sell their nice expensive Toronto home and settle outwards. I know for sure, my kids growing up will want to get the heck out of a small town and into that shoe box said above.
 
This is playing out all over N. America. If you compare it to Gen X, a key difference is Gen X couldn't wait to get their license and be 'free'.
It does amaze me sometimes the differences in Gen X to millennial. First of all, being born in 1971 we didn't have computers at all for much of my childhood (nor calculators in elementary school math), and the internet didn't readily exist until Netscape appears in the mid-1990s. My research skills at uni were in actual books and archives, including microfiche (can anyone still set up those reels?). I never have my cell phone near at home, in fact I don't even own a personal cell phone, and I turn off the work cell when I walk through the door (it's on in the car for Waze). As soon as I graduated uni in 1995 and got my first job I immediately moved out into a basement apartment, and as fast as I could bought my first used car (the next day my girlfriend and I drove to Ottawa for breakfast and then came home). I was absolutely focused on asap getting married, getting a house, starting a family and building both happiness and wealth. I've never understood the adult gamer lifestyle, since to me my Colecovision was put away in my late teens, and I moved onto interacting with the real world. I live in a house, with a kitchen where we make food, instead of eating out or ordering in every meal (I often wonder if the ovens in condo kitchens ever see anything beyond heating up something from a box). I'm happiest when on my own not in front of a screen, but on a vintage motorcycle in the country (and I can actually fix the motorcycle, and do home repair, I own and use tools). I don't understand the Millennial's need to share personal information and to seek affirmation from acquaintances and often strangers online, nor their trust in free information found online (it's worth what you paid for it) vs. paid investigative journalism and accredited research. IMO, constant connectivity is a noose, not a conduit - that's why I like my job, when I'm overseas or on a plane, I'm for the most part unreachable due to either timezone or technological limitations, the independence of both thought and action is thrilling, where I can make personal and business decisions without the need to check with the hivemind.

Reading my thoughts above, I can't imagine being happy in the inverse. Getting back on topic, I think we're a long way from any bubble in non-condo real estate in Toronto proper. Sure houses valued now at $1 million may drop by 20% to $800K, but that's still an upward trend from that same house's 1998 value of $250K.
 
Last edited:
You're generalizing here. If so many millennials want mini mansions, why are they clamouring to move to the core where properties are smaller?
I would argue group think and sheepism is very high with millennials. So many of the young people I know can’t decide on anything without seeking affirmation of their peers and the hive mind.

Imagine being a young adult today and all your peers seem to aspire to working for some software start-up and living in a high rise box? If you seek peer affirmation of your decisions, what chance do you have of seeking a unique path? Sometimes you do break free, in my family circle we have a farrier, went from living in Toronto near suburbs where all his pals were clamering for a cubical and he went to agricultural college, shoeing horses and living in rural Ontario.
 
I would argue group think and sheepism is very high with millennials. So many of the young people I know can’t decide on anything without seeking affirmation of their peers and the hive mind.
I would argue that you sound like an overgeneralizing old fart. And I believe I can say that because I'm an old fart too, since Gen X'ers seem to be old farts around here.

Imagine being a young adult today and all your peers seem to aspire to working for some software start-up and living in a high rise box? If you seek peer affirmation of your decisions, what chance do you have of seeking a unique path? Sometimes you do break free, in my family circle we have a farrier, went from living in Toronto near suburbs where all his pals were clamering for a cubical and he went to agricultural college, shoeing horses and living in rural Ontario.
Uh, I didn't want to live in the middle of nowhere either when I was that age. Not that I could anyway, since as PinkLucy says, the career opportunities just didn't exist there.

BTW, this made me laugh:

imJdVn6.png
 
I agree moving to the East coast would be a lovely choice for millennials and Canada is still a place where you can go live in a quite place and still have some land, affordable living, and a peaceful life (thanks in large part to regional government subsidization direct and indirect).

But let's not pretend that Toronto is this kind of ultra-competitive meat-grinder. The real meat-grinder of existence is the experience of 95% of humanity not living in countries like Canada or Cities like Toronto. Forget Toronto, the real world future is one where Cities we look up to like London or New York don't even crack the top 50 in size and competition for housing!
 
I agree moving to the East coast would be a lovely choice for millennials and Canada is still a place where you can go live in a quite place and still have some land, affordable living, and a peaceful life (thanks in large part to regional government subsidization direct and indirect).

But let's not pretend that Toronto is this kind of ultra-competitive meat-grinder. The real meat-grinder of existence is the experience of 95% of humanity not living in countries like Canada or Cities like Toronto. Forget Toronto, the real world future is one where Cities we look up to like London or New York don't even crack the top 50 in size and competition for housing!

Yup. I can't even bear to think of Mexico City let alone Rio, Manila, Lagos, Calcutta, Cairo .... While housing there may seem cheap in Canadian dollars, it would cost a relative fortune for an actual slum.
 
The market is getting hot again in the core (defined as not Scarborough, generally south of St. Clair/O'Conner). Not as crazy as before, but the millennials love their Streetcar/Subway/Walk-ability/storefront shops/city amenities.
 
I think it's really tough to say how the market will go in the second half of 2018. The industry experts say prices and sales activity will pick up but I'm not so sure. There are a lot of competing forces that may lead to a continuing rebound in second half 2018 but it's not out of the realm of possibility that we could see a market capitulation that will drag down prices another 10-15%. The trailing data coming out is showing a bit of a bloodbath in regional sub-markets (Richmond Hill for example).

One of the big question marks I find is how much of the price-setting activity is based on move-up resale activity? A lot of people have built up equity in their existing properties and use (and need all of) that equity to purchase a new property. Property-less buyers are basically shut out of must sub-markets anyways at this point. If the only way you can buy a property is using existing home equity the resilience of the market in the face of price declines comes in question. It wouldn't take much of a price drop to create a vicious negative feedback loop. This is already happening in some sub-markets but it remains to be seen if the contagion will spread or the pockets of existing strength like the condo market etc. will provide enough resilience?
 
One of the big question marks I find is how much of the price-setting activity is based on move-up resale activity? A lot of people have built up equity in their existing properties and use (and need all of) that equity to purchase a new property. Property-less buyers are basically shut out of must sub-markets anyways at this point. If the only way you can buy a property is using existing home equity the resilience of the market in the face of price declines comes in question. It wouldn't take much of a price drop to create a vicious negative feedback loop.

This is exactly the turn of events I'm hoping for to be able to afford a condo.
 
A globe and mail article this morning pointed out that about half of condo buyers are now going to investors and that a large portion of these investors are holding their properties in cash flow negative positions. While strong rent increase and capital appreciation momentum has sustained the condo market thus far it wouldn’t take much to tip this balance and further price and rent surges look less likely. This is not to say I’m predicting a price drop but that the market does not look like it’s supported by robust fundamentals. A certain amount of suppression of market conditions is government driven (by design). We could see some lifting of spirits with a change in government (good for the market, no comment on it being good for society).
 

Back
Top