|
|
|
- Thread starter simuls
- Start date
slickpete83
Active Member
hmmm... what would actually happen if we tried this now, and who reversed this policy and why. should be if you want to invest in real estate go buy a @#$%! rental apartment building,land or a REIT lol..
slickpete83
Active Member
I never thought I would see the day when real estate speculators would start a protest 
lenaitch
Senior Member
Or we could back to the old way of a developer buying land, servicing it then building a tract of homes (or a block of townhouses, whatever) and then selling them. I don't recall a lot of subdivisions and buildings built in the 50s, 60s and 70s going unsold. Much of the financing and risk has been shifted to the consumer.
wopchop
Building Toronto
The fact that Mattamy can simply sell a home for 16-20% less should make everyone question the developer/industry mantra that high costs are all due to regulations, fees, Greenbelt, etc.
Developers are scum.
Developers are scum.
slickpete83
Active Member
yes that's right 27sqft!! lol..
Admiral Beez
Superstar
Heavens, Paul Bernardo has more square footage.